Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FSTORE-1628] Update deequ for spark 3.5 support #1407

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 3, 2024

Conversation

bubriks
Copy link
Contributor

@bubriks bubriks commented Dec 2, 2024

This PR adds/fixes/changes...

  • please summarize your changes to the code
  • and make sure to include all changes to user-facing APIs

JIRA Issue: -

Priority for Review: -

Related PRs: -

How Has This Been Tested?

  • Unit Tests
  • Integration Tests
  • Manual Tests on VM

Checklist For The Assigned Reviewer:

- [ ] Checked if merge conflicts with master exist
- [ ] Checked if stylechecks for Java and Python pass
- [ ] Checked if all docstrings were added and/or updated appropriately
- [ ] Ran spellcheck on docstring
- [ ] Checked if guides & concepts need to be updated
- [ ] Checked if naming conventions for parameters and variables were followed
- [ ] Checked if private methods are properly declared and used
- [ ] Checked if hard-to-understand areas of code are commented
- [ ] Checked if tests are effective
- [ ] Built and deployed changes on dev VM and tested manually
- [x] (Checked if all type annotations were added and/or updated appropriately)

Copy link
Contributor

@javierdlrm javierdlrm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What about the deequ version here?

@javierdlrm
Copy link
Contributor

What about the deequ version here?

Not needed as the spark profile overrides this value

@javierdlrm javierdlrm self-requested a review December 3, 2024 12:07
@SirOibaf SirOibaf merged commit c702817 into logicalclocks:branch-3.9 Dec 3, 2024
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants