Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Bump version to 6.5.2 #285

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 30, 2024
Merged

Conversation

rb-union
Copy link
Contributor

Bump version to 6.5.2

Log: Bump version to 6.5.2

Bump version to 6.5.2

Log: Bump version to 6.5.2
@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

deepin pr auto review

这个提交的changelog文件更新了deepin-deb-installer的版本号和更新日志。以下是针对这个提交的一些改进建议:

  1. 版本号格式:确保版本号遵循语义化版本控制(Semantic Versioning)的格式,例如6.5.2。如果遵循这个标准,版本号应该遵循主版本号.次版本号.修订号的格式。

  2. 更新日志格式:更新日志应该遵循一定的格式,以便于阅读和维护。通常包括以下部分:

    • 版本号
    • 更新日期
    • 更新者信息
    • 更新内容列表(包括类型和描述)
  3. 更新内容描述:在更新日志中,应该详细描述每个更改的内容,包括:

    • feat:新功能
    • fix:修复的bug
    • chore:其他更改(例如文档更新、格式化等)
  4. 拼写错误:在changelog中,uab-pacakge拼写错误,应该是uab-package

  5. 日期格式:日期格式应该统一,例如使用YYYY-MM-DD格式。

  6. 注释:虽然chore类型通常不需要详细注释,但为了保持代码的可读性和可维护性,建议在必要时添加注释。

综上所述,改进后的changelog文件可能如下所示:

deepin-deb-installer (6.5.2) unstable; urgency=medium

  * feat: 添加UAB安装认证功能(任务ID: 36033)(影响: uab-package)
  * chore: 添加注释
  * chore: 格式化CMakeLists.txt
  * fix: 使用绝对路径修复UAB(影响: uab-package)

 -- renbin <[email protected]>  2024-11-30 13:16:30 +0800

这样不仅提高了代码的可读性,也遵循了标准的更新日志格式。

Copy link

TAG Bot

TAG: 6.5.2
EXISTED: no
DISTRIBUTION: unstable

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: pengfeixx, rb-union

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@rb-union rb-union merged commit 52a0e11 into linuxdeepin:master Nov 30, 2024
21 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants