Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: workspace widget layout issue #2488

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 13, 2024

Conversation

Lighto-Ku
Copy link
Contributor

1.Set right stretch of every widgets inserted in workspace.

Log: fix ui issue

1.Set right stretch of every widgets inserted in workspace.

Log: fix ui issue
@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

deepin pr auto review

代码审查意见:

  1. emptyTrashWidget.cpp文件中,EmptyTrashWidget构造函数中新增了一行setFixedHeight(42);,这可能是为了统一界面风格,但需要确认这个高度是否适合所有情况,以及是否有必要在构造函数中设置固定高度。

  2. workspacewidget.cpp文件中,initViewLayout函数中widgetLayout->addLayout(viewStackLayout, 1);的参数从0变更为1,这可能会改变布局的优先级,需要确认这是否符合设计要求。

  3. initCustomTopWidgets函数中,widgetLayout->insertWidget(0, topWidgetPtr.get());的参数从1变更为0,这表示将新创建的topWidgetPtr插入到布局的最顶部。需要确认这一改动是否符合UI设计,以及是否会影响其他布局元素的显示。

  4. 代码中没有发现明显的语法或逻辑错误,但建议在修改布局参数时添加注释,说明为什么需要这样调整,以便其他开发者理解代码的意图。

  5. 代码风格上,建议保持一致的代码缩进和格式,以提高代码的可读性。

  6. 安全性方面,没有涉及到用户输入或外部资源访问,因此没有特别的安全性问题。

  7. 性能方面,没有明显的性能瓶颈,但建议在添加新功能时进行性能测试,确保不会对整体性能产生负面影响。

总体来说,这些修改看起来是为了改善界面布局和风格,但需要进一步确认这些改动是否符合整体的设计要求和用户的使用习惯。

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Johnson-zs, Lighto-Ku

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@Johnson-zs
Copy link
Contributor

/merge

@deepin-bot deepin-bot bot merged commit 84cfb9a into linuxdeepin:master Dec 13, 2024
20 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants