Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: support for ostree systems #159

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 13, 2023
Merged

Conversation

richm
Copy link
Contributor

@richm richm commented Nov 3, 2023

Feature: Allow running and testing the role with ostree managed nodes.

Reason: We have users who want to use the role to manage ostree
systems.

Result: Users can use the role to manage ostree managed nodes.
Signed-off-by: Rich Megginson [email protected]

@richm richm requested a review from tomjelinek as a code owner November 3, 2023 01:19
@richm
Copy link
Contributor Author

richm commented Nov 3, 2023

[citest]

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 3, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (86d0883) 80.45% compared to head (3695ec0) 80.45%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #159   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   80.45%   80.45%           
=======================================
  Files           3        3           
  Lines         133      133           
=======================================
  Hits          107      107           
  Misses         26       26           
Flag Coverage Δ
sanity ∅ <ø> (∅)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@richm richm force-pushed the ostree branch 2 times, most recently from ba18388 to a00dda5 Compare November 3, 2023 19:45
@richm
Copy link
Contributor Author

richm commented Nov 3, 2023

[citest]

Feature: Allow running and testing the role with ostree managed nodes.

Reason: We have users who want to use the role to manage ostree
systems.

Result: Users can use the role to manage ostree managed nodes.
Signed-off-by: Rich Megginson <[email protected]>

- name: Make sure qnetd config files are not present
file:
path: /etc/corosync/qnetd
state: absent
when: ansible_facts.pkg_mgr | d() != "ansible.posix.rhel_rpm_ostree"
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@tomjelinek this was one of the things I had to add to make ostree happy - apparently when it is added back it loses the ownership

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@richm Oh, I see. I created a ticket https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-16343

@richm
Copy link
Contributor Author

richm commented Nov 10, 2023

[citest]

@tomjelinek tomjelinek self-requested a review November 13, 2023 12:30
@richm richm merged commit 63fc523 into linux-system-roles:main Nov 13, 2023
21 checks passed
@richm richm deleted the ostree branch November 13, 2023 16:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants