-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for fast mode #137
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ny call to wait_until.
Memory usage after merging this PR will be: Memory Reportaction_empty_test_c
action_microstep_test_c
action_overwrite_test_c
action_test_c
delayed_conn_test_c
event_payload_pool_test_c
event_queue_test_c
nanopb_test_c
port_test_c
reaction_queue_test_c
request_shutdown_test_c
startup_test_c
tcp_channel_test_c
timer_test_c
|
Memory usage after merging this PR will be: Memory Reportaction_empty_test_c
action_microstep_test_c
action_overwrite_test_c
action_test_c
delayed_conn_test_c
event_payload_pool_test_c
event_queue_test_c
nanopb_test_c
port_test_c
reaction_queue_test_c
request_shutdown_test_c
startup_test_c
tcp_channel_test_c
timer_test_c
|
Memory usage after merging this PR will be: Memory Reportaction_empty_test_c
action_microstep_test_c
action_overwrite_test_c
action_test_c
delayed_conn_test_c
event_payload_pool_test_c
event_queue_test_c
nanopb_test_c
port_test_c
reaction_queue_test_c
request_shutdown_test_c
startup_test_c
tcp_channel_test_c
timer_test_c
|
2 similar comments
Memory usage after merging this PR will be: Memory Reportaction_empty_test_c
action_microstep_test_c
action_overwrite_test_c
action_test_c
delayed_conn_test_c
event_payload_pool_test_c
event_queue_test_c
nanopb_test_c
port_test_c
reaction_queue_test_c
request_shutdown_test_c
startup_test_c
tcp_channel_test_c
timer_test_c
|
Memory usage after merging this PR will be: Memory Reportaction_empty_test_c
action_microstep_test_c
action_overwrite_test_c
action_test_c
delayed_conn_test_c
event_payload_pool_test_c
event_queue_test_c
nanopb_test_c
port_test_c
reaction_queue_test_c
request_shutdown_test_c
startup_test_c
tcp_channel_test_c
timer_test_c
|
Memory usage after merging this PR will be: Memory Reportaction_empty_test_c
action_microstep_test_c
action_overwrite_test_c
action_test_c
delayed_conn_test_c
event_payload_pool_test_c
event_queue_test_c
nanopb_test_c
port_test_c
reaction_queue_test_c
request_shutdown_test_c
startup_test_c
tcp_channel_test_c
timer_test_c
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Very simple addition, just check a flag in the
wait_until
function and return immediately if we are in fast mode. I dont do anything withwait_for
.Most of the diff is bringing over code from upstream LFC for handling the target property