Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revisions to glyma.Bai_Jing_2021.yml and renaming to glyma.Bai_Jing_2020.yml on 23 April 2024 #40

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 24, 2024

Conversation

ScottKalberer
Copy link
Collaborator

Produced a revised version of the gene_function_registry file glyma.Bai_Jing_2020.yml that's new and improved. Corrections include the issue requested as "Incorrect gene_model_pub_name name in Glycine/max/studies/glyma.Bai_Jing_2021.yml #38". Finally, I renamed the file to glyma.Bai_Jing_2020.yml based on the correct date of print publication in 2020 (a corrigendum for figure 4c was published in 2021). I created the new branch glyma.Bai_Jing_2020 with this revised file and pushed it up to the GitHub origin. I'm requesting review of this YML gene function file, merge of the changes into main branch, and subsequent deletion of this temporary branch on GitHub.

Copy link
Collaborator

@StevenCannon-USDA StevenCannon-USDA left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good; thank you.

@StevenCannon-USDA StevenCannon-USDA merged commit b22e02e into main Apr 24, 2024
2 checks passed
@StevenCannon-USDA StevenCannon-USDA deleted the glyma.Bai_Jing_2020 branch April 24, 2024 19:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
duplicate This issue or pull request already exists enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants