chore(deps): update dependency tornado to v6.4.2 [security] #165
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR contains the following updates:
==6.0.4
->==6.4.2
GitHub Vulnerability Alerts
CVE-2023-28370
Open redirect vulnerability in Tornado versions 6.3.1 and earlier allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to redirect a user to an arbitrary web site and conduct a phishing attack by having user access a specially crafted URL.
GHSA-qppv-j76h-2rpx
Summary
Tornado interprets
-
,+
, and_
in chunk length andContent-Length
values, which are not allowed by the HTTP RFCs. This can result in request smuggling when Tornado is deployed behind certain proxies that interpret those non-standard characters differently. This is known to apply to older versions of haproxy, although the current release is not affected.Details
Tornado uses the
int
constructor to parse the values ofContent-Length
headers and chunk lengths in the following locations:tornado/http1connection.py:445
tornado/http1connection.py:621
tornado/http1connection.py:671
Because
int("0_0") == int("+0") == int("-0") == int("0")
, using theint
constructor to parse and validate strings that should contain only ASCII digits is not a good strategy.GHSA-753j-mpmx-qq6g
Summary
When Tornado receives a request with two
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
headers, it ignores them both. This enables request smuggling when Tornado is deployed behind a proxy server that emits such requests. Pound does this.PoC
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
headers:This is because Tornado believes that the request has no message body, so it tries to interpret
1\r\nZ\r\n0\r\n\r\n
as its own request, which causes a 400 response. With a little cleverness involvingchunk-ext
s, you can get Tornado to instead respond 405, which has the potential to desynchronize the connection, as opposed to 400 which should always result in a connection closure.Impact
Anyone using Tornado behind a proxy that forwards requests containing multiple
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
headers is vulnerable to request smuggling, which may entail ACL bypass, cache poisoning, or connection desynchronization.GHSA-w235-7p84-xx57
Summary
Tornado’s
curl_httpclient.CurlAsyncHTTPClient
class is vulnerable to CRLF (carriage return/line feed) injection in the request headers.Details
When an HTTP request is sent using
CurlAsyncHTTPClient
, Tornado does not reject carriage return (\r) or line feed (\n) characters in the request headers. As a result, if an application includes an attacker-controlled header value in a request sent usingCurlAsyncHTTPClient
, the attacker can inject arbitrary headers into the request or cause the application to send arbitrary requests to the specified server.This behavior differs from that of the standard
AsyncHTTPClient
class, which does reject CRLF characters.This issue appears to stem from libcurl's (as well as pycurl's) lack of validation for the
HTTPHEADER
option. libcurl’s documentation states:pycurl similarly appears to assume that the headers adhere to the correct format. Therefore, without any validation on Tornado’s part, header names and values are included verbatim in the request sent by
CurlAsyncHTTPClient
, including any control characters that have special meaning in HTTP semantics.PoC
The issue can be reproduced using the following script:
When the specified server receives the request, it contains the injected header (
Header: Injected
) on its own line:The attacker can also construct entirely new requests using a payload with multiple CRLF sequences. For example, specifying a header value of
\r\n\r\nPOST /attacker-controlled-url HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: 727ymeu841qydmnwlol261ktkkqbe24qt.oastify.com
results in the server receiving an additional, attacker-controlled request:Impact
Applications using the Tornado library to send HTTP requests with untrusted header data are affected. This issue may facilitate the exploitation of server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilities.
CVE-2024-52804
The algorithm used for parsing HTTP cookies in Tornado versions prior to 6.4.2 sometimes has quadratic complexity, leading to excessive CPU consumption when parsing maliciously-crafted cookie headers. This parsing occurs in the event loop thread and may block the processing of other requests.
See also CVE-2024-7592 for a similar vulnerability in cpython.
Release Notes
tornadoweb/tornado (tornado)
v6.4.2
Compare Source
v6.4.1
Compare Source
v6.4
Compare Source
v6.3.3
Compare Source
v6.3.2
Compare Source
v6.3.1
Compare Source
v6.3
Compare Source
v6.2
Compare Source
v6.1
Compare Source
Configuration
📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).
🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.
♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.
This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.