Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add svelte example project and improving SDK docs #722

Open
wants to merge 21 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

nosnibor89
Copy link
Contributor

@nosnibor89 nosnibor89 commented Dec 19, 2024

Requirements

  • I have added test coverage for new or changed functionality (no behavior change is mostly example project and docs)
  • I have followed the repository's pull request submission guidelines
  • I have validated my changes against all supported platform versions

Related issues

No issue.

Describe the solution you've provided

This pull request introduces a new Svelte example project to demonstrate the usage of @launchdarkly/svelte-client-sdk. The README of the example project includes steps to run such application that internally uses the SDK to interact with a boolean flag.

Also, this PR adds documentation for @launchdarkly/svelte-client-sdk itself with a "Getting Started" session along with more advanced use of the SDK's api.

Describe alternatives you've considered

I don't know what to write here.

Additional context

This is a follow up PR for #632. Where Svelte SDK was introduced.

After this, follow up PR for technical debt(upgrade Svelte 5 and improving test coverage ) should be expected

robinson-md and others added 21 commits October 23, 2024 17:04
intial refactor to use new "@launchdarkly/js-client-sdk"
[refactor] Update SvelteLDClient to use proxy for flag variations. Allows to track flag evaluations
…ents

refactor: update SvelteLDClient to use compat SDK and improve initial…
@nosnibor89 nosnibor89 changed the title Feat/svelte sdk example feat: add svelte example project and improving SDK docs Jan 6, 2025
@nosnibor89 nosnibor89 marked this pull request as ready for review January 6, 2025 21:04
@nosnibor89 nosnibor89 requested a review from a team as a code owner January 6, 2025 21:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants