Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

making the rotating package tagging compatible #1537

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

u-fischer
Copy link
Member

Resolves issues latex3/tagging-project#751 and latex3/tagging-project#112

Status of pull request

  • Ready to merge

Checklist of required changes before merge will be approved

  • [x Test file(s) added
  • Version and date string updated in changed source files
  • Relevant \changes entries in source included
  • Relevant changes.txt updated
  • Rollback provided (if necessary)? needed??
  • [n/a] ltnewsX.tex (and/or latexchanges.tex) updated

Comment on lines +363 to +368
% \changes{v2.16e}{2024/11/01}{correct tagging of the minipage}
% \begin{macrocode}
\begin{lrbox}\rot@float@box
\SuspendTagging{\minipage}%
\begin{minipage}\textheight
\ResumeTagging{\minipage}%
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think I can guess what happens here, but from the outside the suspensions look odd. I wonder if that case happens elsewhere too and should get some sort of an interface, or at least perhaps a sentence or two explaining what goes on.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can add a sentence, but I have no idea for a better interface. One doesn't want the tagging from the minipage environment and imho this can only be done either by surrounding the minipage with such a code, or by defining a dedicated environment minipagewithouttagging.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the question to ask is under which circumstances do you not want minipage tagging? Because of it being inside an lrbox/mbox? What should happen if you have an lrbox with 2 minipages inside?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

point is use of lrbox is core LaTeX so the combination with minipage should work. without the need to disable and reanable tagging by the user

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I do not want the minipage tag (the Div) because I'm in a float and this minipage has no semantic meaning. I do not want the \tagmcend\tagstructend before the minipage (which normally closes a P-tag) and the reopening after the minipage as the minipage is in a lrbox and fills it up. Two minipages (without other material) should probably use a Div around them.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

point is use of lrbox is core LaTeX so the combination with minipage should work. without the need to disable and reanable tagging by the user

Well the problem is that xxx minipage yyy in a lrbox needs different tagging to minipage alone. (At least with pdflatex which has to insert correctly nested MC-literals.)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants