Change macos-12 to macos-13

[FrancoGiachetta]

Change macos-12 to macos-13

Description

Since macos-12 has been deprecated, this PR changes the workflows to use macos-latest.

Checklist

• Linked to Github Issue
• Unit tests added
• Integration tests added.
• This change requires new documentation.
  • Documentation has been added/updated.
  • CHANGELOG has been updated.

[github-actions]

**Hyper Thereading Benchmark results**




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 1" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 1" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 1
  Time (mean ± σ):     32.412 s ±  0.039 s    [User: 31.672 s, System: 0.738 s]
  Range (min … max):   32.384 s … 32.440 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 1
  Time (mean ± σ):     32.331 s ±  0.018 s    [User: 31.550 s, System: 0.780 s]
  Range (min … max):   32.318 s … 32.344 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  'hyper_threading_pr threads: 1' ran
    1.00 ± 0.00 times faster than 'hyper_threading_main threads: 1'




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 2" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=2 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 2" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=2 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 2
  Time (mean ± σ):     17.915 s ±  0.016 s    [User: 31.359 s, System: 0.786 s]
  Range (min … max):   17.904 s … 17.927 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 2
  Time (mean ± σ):     17.900 s ±  0.024 s    [User: 31.375 s, System: 0.764 s]
  Range (min … max):   17.884 s … 17.917 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  'hyper_threading_pr threads: 2' ran
    1.00 ± 0.00 times faster than 'hyper_threading_main threads: 2'




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 4" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 4" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 4
  Time (mean ± σ):     12.694 s ±  0.054 s    [User: 43.560 s, System: 0.915 s]
  Range (min … max):   12.655 s … 12.732 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 4
  Time (mean ± σ):     12.359 s ±  0.489 s    [User: 43.669 s, System: 0.939 s]
  Range (min … max):   12.013 s … 12.704 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  'hyper_threading_pr threads: 4' ran
    1.03 ± 0.04 times faster than 'hyper_threading_main threads: 4'




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 6" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=6 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 6" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=6 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 6
  Time (mean ± σ):     12.052 s ±  0.301 s    [User: 44.067 s, System: 0.984 s]
  Range (min … max):   11.839 s … 12.265 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 6
  Time (mean ± σ):     12.109 s ±  0.027 s    [User: 43.649 s, System: 0.998 s]
  Range (min … max):   12.089 s … 12.128 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  'hyper_threading_main threads: 6' ran
    1.00 ± 0.03 times faster than 'hyper_threading_pr threads: 6'




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 8" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=8 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 8" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=8 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 8
  Time (mean ± σ):     11.841 s ±  0.172 s    [User: 44.214 s, System: 0.958 s]
  Range (min … max):   11.719 s … 11.962 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 8
  Time (mean ± σ):     11.943 s ±  0.153 s    [User: 44.372 s, System: 0.995 s]
  Range (min … max):   11.835 s … 12.051 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  'hyper_threading_main threads: 8' ran
    1.01 ± 0.02 times faster than 'hyper_threading_pr threads: 8'




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 16" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=16 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 16" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=16 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 16
  Time (mean ± σ):     11.882 s ±  0.167 s    [User: 44.469 s, System: 1.101 s]
  Range (min … max):   11.764 s … 12.000 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 16
  Time (mean ± σ):     11.697 s ±  0.020 s    [User: 44.703 s, System: 1.010 s]
  Range (min … max):   11.683 s … 11.711 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  'hyper_threading_pr threads: 16' ran
    1.02 ± 0.01 times faster than 'hyper_threading_main threads: 16'

[github-actions]

Benchmark Results for unmodified programs 🚀

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base big_factorial	2.519 ± 0.048	2.475	2.606	1.00 ± 0.02
head big_factorial	2.517 ± 0.034	2.479	2.587	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base big_fibonacci	2.468 ± 0.054	2.433	2.617	1.00 ± 0.02
head big_fibonacci	2.457 ± 0.021	2.431	2.499	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base blake2s_integration_benchmark	9.260 ± 0.113	9.111	9.519	1.00
head blake2s_integration_benchmark	9.261 ± 0.202	9.039	9.748	1.00 ± 0.02

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base compare_arrays_200000	2.583 ± 0.010	2.571	2.604	1.00 ± 0.01
head compare_arrays_200000	2.580 ± 0.017	2.558	2.611	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base dict_integration_benchmark	1.684 ± 0.021	1.667	1.738	1.00
head dict_integration_benchmark	1.688 ± 0.011	1.667	1.699	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base field_arithmetic_get_square_benchmark	1.441 ± 0.046	1.412	1.560	1.01 ± 0.03
head field_arithmetic_get_square_benchmark	1.427 ± 0.006	1.418	1.437	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base integration_builtins	9.311 ± 0.081	9.183	9.427	1.00 ± 0.02
head integration_builtins	9.299 ± 0.142	9.192	9.689	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base keccak_integration_benchmark	9.723 ± 0.367	9.464	10.689	1.01 ± 0.04
head keccak_integration_benchmark	9.618 ± 0.159	9.470	10.028	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base linear_search	2.586 ± 0.021	2.566	2.637	1.00 ± 0.02
head linear_search	2.575 ± 0.032	2.551	2.654	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base math_cmp_and_pow_integration_benchmark	1.749 ± 0.019	1.726	1.784	1.00
head math_cmp_and_pow_integration_benchmark	1.762 ± 0.027	1.728	1.822	1.01 ± 0.02

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base math_integration_benchmark	1.693 ± 0.016	1.670	1.715	1.00
head math_integration_benchmark	1.707 ± 0.037	1.669	1.805	1.01 ± 0.02

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base memory_integration_benchmark	1.436 ± 0.011	1.415	1.450	1.00
head memory_integration_benchmark	1.442 ± 0.012	1.426	1.456	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base operations_with_data_structures_benchmarks	1.827 ± 0.029	1.805	1.907	1.01 ± 0.02
head operations_with_data_structures_benchmarks	1.809 ± 0.014	1.783	1.830	1.00

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base pedersen	591.4 ± 5.7	587.3	607.0	1.00
head pedersen	591.8 ± 10.7	582.6	613.4	1.00 ± 0.02

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base poseidon_integration_benchmark	711.5 ± 11.7	701.0	739.7	1.01 ± 0.02
head poseidon_integration_benchmark	702.8 ± 5.1	693.5	712.1	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base secp_integration_benchmark	2.075 ± 0.016	2.061	2.114	1.00 ± 0.01
head secp_integration_benchmark	2.068 ± 0.019	2.049	2.113	1.00

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base set_integration_benchmark	686.7 ± 5.4	678.1	698.1	1.00
head set_integration_benchmark	690.3 ± 13.7	683.8	728.9	1.01 ± 0.02

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base uint256_integration_benchmark	5.112 ± 0.127	5.019	5.376	1.01 ± 0.03
head uint256_integration_benchmark	5.067 ± 0.048	5.005	5.143	1.00

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.33%. Comparing base (0b30ba2) to head (745b8f4).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1883   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.33%   96.33%           
=======================================
  Files         102      102           
  Lines       40687    40687           
=======================================
  Hits        39195    39195           
  Misses       1492     1492           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.