Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix c-0077 c-0076 #518

Closed
wants to merge 8 commits into from
Closed

Fix c-0077 c-0076 #518

wants to merge 8 commits into from

Conversation

YiscahLevySilas1
Copy link
Collaborator

@YiscahLevySilas1 YiscahLevySilas1 commented Oct 9, 2023

PR Type:

Bug fix, Refactoring


PR Description:

This PR includes changes to the rules and tests related to Kubernetes labels usage. The rule names have been refactored to follow a consistent naming convention. The logic for checking label usage has been updated to use the first value of recommended labels for the label key. The tests have been updated to reflect these changes.


PR Main Files Walkthrough:

files:

controls/C-0077-k8scommonlabelsusage.json: The rule name has been updated to follow a consistent naming convention.
rules/k8s-common-labels-usage/raw.rego: The logic for checking label usage has been updated to use the first value of recommended labels for the label key.
rules/k8s-common-labels-usage/rule.metadata.json: The rule name has been updated to follow a consistent naming convention.
rules/k8s-common-labels-usage/test/cronjob/data.json: The test data has been updated to include recommended labels.
rules/k8s-common-labels-usage/test/cronjob/expected.json: The expected test result has been updated to reflect the changes in the rule logic.
rules/label-usage-for-resources/raw.rego: The logic for checking label usage has been updated to use the first value of recommended labels for the label key.
rules/label-usage-for-resources/test/cronjob/data.json: The test data has been updated to include recommended labels.
rules/label-usage-for-resources/test/cronjob/expected.json: The expected test result has been updated to reflect the changes in the rule logic.
rules/label-usage-for-resources/test/pod/data.json: The test data has been updated to include recommended labels.
rules/label-usage-for-resources/test/pod/expected.json: The expected test result has been updated to reflect the changes in the rule logic.


User Description:

Overview

itsmeital and others added 7 commits October 8, 2023 16:52
Signed-off-by: Meital Rudnitsky <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Meital Rudnitsky <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Meital Rudnitsky <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Meital Rudnitsky <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: YiscahLevySilas1 <[email protected]>
@codiumai-pr-agent-free
Copy link
Contributor

PR Analysis

  • 🎯 Main theme: Refactoring and bug fixing of Kubernetes labels usage rules and tests
  • 📝 PR summary: This PR focuses on refactoring the naming convention of rules and updating the logic for checking label usage in Kubernetes. It also includes updates to the tests to reflect these changes. The new logic uses the first value of recommended labels for the label key.
  • 📌 Type of PR: Bug fix, Refactoring
  • 🧪 Relevant tests added: Yes

How to use

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:
/review [-i]: Request a review of your Pull Request. For an incremental review, which only considers changes since the last review, include the '-i' option.
/describe: Modify the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
/improve [--extended]: Suggest improvements to the code in the PR. Extended mode employs several calls, and provides a more thorough feedback.
/ask <QUESTION>: Pose a question about the PR.
/update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.

To edit any configuration parameter from configuration.toml, add --config_path=new_value
For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..."
To list the possible configuration parameters, use the /config command.

Signed-off-by: YiscahLevySilas1 <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants