Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add sast-shell-check task #1437

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 18, 2024
Merged

add sast-shell-check task #1437

merged 3 commits into from
Nov 18, 2024

Conversation

rhyw
Copy link
Contributor

@rhyw rhyw commented Sep 18, 2024

No description provided.

@rhyw rhyw marked this pull request as draft September 19, 2024 09:29
@rhyw
Copy link
Contributor Author

rhyw commented Sep 19, 2024

Marking as draft for now since we'll need to comply with some sast convention first.

@rhyw rhyw force-pushed the sast-shellcheck branch 2 times, most recently from 0e75cb1 to 489ea23 Compare September 23, 2024 06:49
@rhyw rhyw changed the title add sast-shellcheck task add sast-shell-check task Sep 23, 2024
@rhyw rhyw force-pushed the sast-shellcheck branch 2 times, most recently from 016a826 to 3819a60 Compare September 23, 2024 11:26
task/sast-shell-check/0.1/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@rhyw
Copy link
Contributor Author

rhyw commented Sep 25, 2024

@kdudka I added 2 commits for review. I'll squash them into one single commit before it's getting merged.

@rhyw rhyw requested a review from kdudka September 25, 2024 06:29
@rhyw rhyw force-pushed the sast-shellcheck branch 2 times, most recently from 1c1285c to b7aa95f Compare September 26, 2024 13:36
@rhyw rhyw requested a review from kdudka September 26, 2024 13:53
task/sast-shell-check/0.1/sast-shell-check.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
task/sast-shell-check/0.1/sast-shell-check.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@rhyw rhyw requested a review from kdudka September 27, 2024 03:14
@jperezdealgaba
Copy link
Contributor

You you mind also updating the OWNERS file to add @kdudka as we do here; #1538 ?

Thanks!

Copy link
Contributor

@14rcole 14rcole left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@jperezdealgaba
Copy link
Contributor

/verify-owners

@rhyw
Copy link
Contributor Author

rhyw commented Nov 4, 2024

Re-generated the oci-ta task / squashed the fix up commits. No other changes.

@kdudka
Copy link
Contributor

kdudka commented Nov 6, 2024

/ok-to-test

@dirgim dirgim added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 6, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to no response for status checks Nov 6, 2024
@kdudka
Copy link
Contributor

kdudka commented Nov 11, 2024

@dirgim The CI is green but the merge has failed. What should be the next steps?

@dirgim dirgim added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 11, 2024
@dirgim
Copy link
Contributor

dirgim commented Nov 11, 2024

There are some infra-related issues with e2e tests and don't seem related to this change, rerunning should work as far as I can see.

@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Nov 11, 2024
@dirgim dirgim added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 12, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Nov 12, 2024
@kdudka
Copy link
Contributor

kdudka commented Nov 18, 2024

@dirgim Could you please move this forward? This merge request has been waiting for merge since November 4th.

@MartinBasti MartinBasti added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 18, 2024
Merged via the queue into konflux-ci:main with commit 4e23182 Nov 18, 2024
14 checks passed
@rhyw
Copy link
Contributor Author

rhyw commented Nov 19, 2024

Thanks all for your time!

@rhyw rhyw deleted the sast-shellcheck branch November 19, 2024 05:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants