Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

feat: ProtocolHandler self management functions #1641

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: protocol-handler
Choose a base branch
from
Open

feat: ProtocolHandler self management functions #1641

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

obatirou
Copy link
Collaborator

What is the new behavior?

  • Add the self management function for the ProtocolHandler
  • Introduces cairo-coverage for snfoundry and assert_macros
// Self management
* fn change_operator(new_address_operator: ContractAddress) SECURITY_COUNCIL
* fn change_security_council(new_security_council_address: ContractAddress) SECURITY_COUNCIL
* fn add_guardian(new_guardians_address: ContractAddress) SECURITY_COUNCIL
* fn remove_guardian(guardian_to_remove_address: ContractAddress) SECURITY_COUNCIL
* fn change_gas_price_admin(new_gas_price_admin: ContractAddres) SECURITY_COUNCIL

obatirou
obatirou commented Nov 26, 2024
View reviewed changes
cairo/protocol_handler/src/protocol_handler.cairo
pub operator: ContractAddress,
pub guardians: Map<ContractAddress, bool>,
pub guardians: Vec<ContractAddress>,
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@obatirou obatirou Nov 26, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe add documentation on the behavior of Vec with the remove and add ?
Should this storage variable be kept ?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't understand your comment

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@obatirou obatirou Nov 27, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is related to the discussion about storage vec not being able to remove an element. The length will not change when a guardian is removed.

@obatirou obatirou marked this pull request as ready for review November 26, 2024 16:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@enitrat enitrat Awaiting requested review from enitrat

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@obatirou @enitrat