Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes for 2i2c hetzner member #3182

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jan 22, 2025
Merged

Fixes for 2i2c hetzner member #3182

merged 6 commits into from
Jan 22, 2025

Conversation

yuvipanda
Copy link
Contributor

  • Put object storage in same DC as the server

    When I recreated the server, I had to do so in nuremberg
    rather than falkenstein because their nuremberg server was full.
    But the object storage for the images remained in the old location.

    I've created a new object storage bucket and moved that!

  • Bring registry replicas back to 1

    It doesn't do much since the pulls go directly from hetzner I believe,
    and keeping it at 1 makes debugging easier for right now

  • Increase the amount of resources dind has

    As this is a new member, there's gonna be a lot of builds to
    start with. Let's support that with higher resource limits.

  • Increase binderhub replicas to 2

  • Add suspicious but maybe useful nginx limit increase

  • Increase 2i2c quota even more

When I recreated the server, I had to do so in nuremberg
rather than falkenstein because their nuremberg server was full.
But the object storage for the images remained in the old location.

I've created a new object storage bucket and moved that!
It doesn't do much since the pulls go directly from hetzner I believe,
and keeping it at 1 makes debugging easier for right now
As this is a new member, there's gonna be a lot of builds to
start with. Let's support that with higher resource limits.
@yuvipanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm also manually increasing --max-concurrent-uploads on the dind daemonset after each deployment as that was the source of all the build backups we were seeing earlier.

@yuvipanda yuvipanda merged commit 7d5333e into jupyterhub:main Jan 22, 2025
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant