Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[docs] add feasibility cuts to Benders decomposition #3833

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 2, 2024
Merged

[docs] add feasibility cuts to Benders decomposition #3833

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 2, 2024

Conversation

odow
Copy link
Member

@odow odow commented Oct 2, 2024

I've changed to a more realistic example, since the Matrix input was a bit misleading. I've also added feasibility cuts (at the end, to keep the initial developments simpler).

Preview: https://jump.dev/JuMP.jl/previews/PR3833/tutorials/algorithms/benders_decomposition/

x-ref #2348 (comment)

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 2, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.90%. Comparing base (563cb63) to head (2a1ab90).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3833   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.90%   97.90%           
=======================================
  Files          44       44           
  Lines        6019     6019           
=======================================
  Hits         5893     5893           
  Misses        126      126           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@odow odow merged commit 0d515c8 into master Oct 2, 2024
13 checks passed
@odow odow deleted the od/feas branch October 2, 2024 05:48
@trulsf
Copy link
Contributor

trulsf commented Oct 2, 2024

Thanks for these updates! I was looking at this example to find out how to add feasibility cuts in Benders' a few days ago and suddenly they are here :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants