Maybe improve installation.md by showing package's "popularity"

[LebedevRI]

For me at least, picking the "right" solver is still a but daunting.
It would be nice to be actually able to filter by features (i mean,
other than Ctrl+F), but asides from that, perhaps showing
the "popularity" of each particular Julia package might make choosing easier?

This is how it looks: https://github.com/LebedevRI/JuMP.jl/blob/installation.md/docs/src/installation.md#supported-solvers

If this looks too ugly, or is not wanted, please just close the PR :)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (96b4147) 98.37% compared to head (24f6715) 98.37%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3589   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.37%   98.37%           
=======================================
  Files          38       38           
  Lines        5673     5673           
=======================================
  Hits         5581     5581           
  Misses         92       92           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[odow]

I think we need to be quite careful here. I agree that JuMP could make it easier to suggest solvers for a particular problem class, but we don't really want to pick winners.

One thing we do have is the README for each solver: https://jump.dev/JuMP.jl/stable/packages/solvers/

If we wanted to make the table a little easier to read, we could consider dropping the solver column in favor of just the Julia package and include the organization. So jump-dev/HiGHS.jl. But I don't know what we'd do with multiple solvers in the same package, like AmplNLWriter.

[odow]

Perhaps to clarify though: I'm very open to suggestions for changes. I don't particularly like the table or think that it is very helpful...