-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[api_v3][query] Change api_v3 grpc handler to use query service v2 #6452
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Mahad Zaryab <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mahad Zaryab <[email protected]>
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #6452 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 96.26% 96.27%
=======================================
Files 370 371 +1
Lines 21144 21195 +51
=======================================
+ Hits 20355 20406 +51
Misses 604 604
Partials 185 185
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Signed-off-by: Mahad Zaryab <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mahad Zaryab <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mahad Zaryab <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm, but lint/tests are not happy
@yurishkuro yep - I need to fix the tests. Will do that now. |
Signed-off-by: Mahad Zaryab <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mahad Zaryab <[email protected]>
cmd/query/app/flags.go
Outdated
return opts | ||
} | ||
|
||
func initializeV2ArchiveStorage( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@yurishkuro we're repeating this logic two times at the moment (here and in the query server). Should we move this into a common helper somewhere?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok to leave for now. We haven't finished archive factory PR, but the idea was that in the v2 extension we won't be using v1adapter but get v2 reader/writer directly from storage extension.
Signed-off-by: Mahad Zaryab <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mahad Zaryab <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mahad Zaryab <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mahad Zaryab <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mahad Zaryab <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mahad Zaryab <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mahad Zaryab <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mahad Zaryab <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mahad Zaryab <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mahad Zaryab <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mahad Zaryab <[email protected]>
…aegertracing#6452) ## Which problem is this PR solving? - Towards jaegertracing#6337 ## Description of the changes - This PR migrates the v3_api GRPC handler to use the new v2 query service. ## How was this change tested? - CI ## Checklist - [x] I have read https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING_GUIDELINES.md - [x] I have signed all commits - [x] I have added unit tests for the new functionality - [x] I have run lint and test steps successfully - for `jaeger`: `make lint test` - for `jaeger-ui`: `npm run lint` and `npm run test` --------- Signed-off-by: Mahad Zaryab <[email protected]>
Which problem is this PR solving?
Description of the changes
How was this change tested?
Checklist
jaeger
:make lint test
jaeger-ui
:npm run lint
andnpm run test