Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add Cilium v1.15.1 #82

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 16, 2024
Merged

Add Cilium v1.15.1 #82

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 16, 2024
+34,854 −0

Conversation

michi-covalent
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@michi-covalent
Add Cilium v1.15.1
4b2cff3 
Signed-off-by: Michi Mutsuzaki <[email protected]>
@michi-covalent
Copy link
Contributor Author

❌❌ 2 unexpected failures

[sig-network] Netpol NetworkPolicy between server and client should deny egress from all pods in a namespace [Feature:NetworkPolicy]  [Skipped:Network/OpenShiftSDN/Multitenant] [Skipped:Network/OpenShiftSDN] [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s]
[sig-network] Netpol NetworkPolicy between server and client should not allow access by TCP when a policy specifies only UDP [Feature:NetworkPolicy] [Skipped:Network/OpenShiftSDN/Multitenant] [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s]

✅✅✅ expected failures

[sig-network] Netpol NetworkPolicy between server and client should allow egress access to server in CIDR block [Feature:NetworkPolicy] [Skipped:Network/OpenShiftSDN/Multitenant] [Skipped:Network/OpenShiftSDN] [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s]
[sig-network] Netpol NetworkPolicy between server and client should enforce except clause while egress access to server in CIDR block [Feature:NetworkPolicy] [Skipped:Network/OpenShiftSDN/Multitenant] [Skipped:Network/OpenShiftSDN] [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s]
[sig-network] Netpol NetworkPolicy between server and client should ensure an IP overlapping both IPBlock.CIDR and IPBlock.Except is allowed [Feature:NetworkPolicy] [Skipped:Network/OpenShiftSDN/Multitenant] [Skipped:Network/OpenShiftSDN] [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s]

@michi-covalent
Copy link
Contributor Author

edit: these 2 unexpected errors went away when i re-ran the test. proceeding.

✅✅✅ results.txt

@michi-covalent michi-covalent marked this pull request as ready for review February 16, 2024 01:25
@michi-covalent michi-covalent requested a review from a team as a code owner February 16, 2024 01:25
@michi-covalent michi-covalent merged commit 8983467 into main Feb 16, 2024
3 checks passed
@michi-covalent michi-covalent deleted the pr/v1.15.1 branch February 16, 2024 01:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@michi-covalent