-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(marriage-conditions): certificates fix #17487
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Changes
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #17487 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 35.61% 35.61%
=======================================
Files 7015 7015
Lines 150313 150313
Branches 42975 42975
=======================================
Hits 53537 53537
Misses 96776 96776
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
libs/application/templates/marriage-conditions/src/fields/PaymentInfo/index.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-120
: Component structure follows best practices for reusability.The component demonstrates good practices:
- Proper TypeScript usage with explicit types
- Leverages shared UI components and utilities
- Named exports for better tree-shaking
Consider extracting the price calculation logic into a separate utility function for better reusability across different payment-related components.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
libs/application/templates/marriage-conditions/src/fields/PaymentInfo/index.tsx
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
libs/application/templates/marriage-conditions/src/fields/PaymentInfo/index.tsx (1)
Pattern libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
- GitHub Check: tests (application-system-api)
- GitHub Check: docker-build ({"projects":"application-system-form","docker_type":"docker-static"})
- GitHub Check: docker-build ({"projects":"application-system-api","docker_type":"docker-express"})
- GitHub Check: docker-build ({"projects":"api","docker_type":"docker-express"})
- GitHub Check: tests (application-system-form,application-template-api-modules,application-template-loader,appli...
libs/application/templates/marriage-conditions/src/fields/PaymentInfo/index.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Datadog ReportAll test runs ✅ 4 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 4 Passed Test Services
|
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit