Guest test td func 1213 #154
Conversation
improve on test_launcher timeout logic control on test_executor: - extend TIMEOUT from 300 to 900 to adapt to new TDX guest TCs - add return code in guest_test_close function - check guest_test_close return code for all TCs [Test Components] tdx [Test Types] func [Supported Devices] spr,emr,gnr,srf Signed-off-by: Hongyu Ning <[email protected]>
add 3 lazy accept memory functional TCs base on guest-test framework [Test Components] tdx [Test Types] func [Supported Devices] spr,emr,gnr,srf Signed-off-by: Hongyu Ning <[email protected]>
hongyuni
force-pushed
the
guest_test_td_func_1213
branch
from
a76e85e to
ff3b081
Compare
add TDX #VE HALT handling TC based on tdx_halt_test_module [Test Components] tdx [Test Types] func [Supported Devices] spr,emr,gnr,srf Signed-off-by: Hongyu Ning <[email protected]>
hongyuni
force-pushed
the
guest_test_td_func_1213
branch
from
ff3b081 to
205ecaf
Compare
guest-test/guest.test_executor.sh
Outdated
| return 0 | ||
| else | ||
| return 1 | ||
| fi |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
ah, my bad (miss-leading by the EOF line before), revised all such issues in this source code.
| ###################### Do Works ###################### | ||
| if [[ -f "$test_module".ko ]]; then | ||
| test_print_trc "Kernel test module: $test_module.ko is ready for test" | ||
| insmod "$test_module".ko || \ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hi Hongyu, it seems that you haven't created the module. I guess it needs to be compiled before inserting it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
there is a test module (the following: guest-test/tdx/tdx_halt_test_module/halt_test.c) being compiled before above test script execution
| pr_info("[TD guest test] Start to trigger hlt instr.\n"); | ||
| asm("cli"); | ||
| asm("hlt"); | ||
| return 0; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is it worthwhile to create a separate kernel module for this?
I have an idea about creating a common test module in LKVS.
Let's have a discussion later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
that would be nice, let's discuss your common test module solution
No description provided.