Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

change(atom_naming_convention): do not apply to function names #378

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 16, 2024

Conversation

bormilan
Copy link
Contributor

Description

I just added a check to filter out the atom nodes with a parent with type remote.
I should add some other types as well.

Closes #204.

Copy link
Member

@elbrujohalcon elbrujohalcon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just a tiny change. I'll apply it and merge the PR directly.

src/elvis_style.erl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@elbrujohalcon elbrujohalcon merged commit 1ddf014 into inaka:main Dec 16, 2024
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Do not apply atom_naming_convention over function names, only atoms used as atoms
2 participants