ReactiveCocoa (RAC) is a Cocoa framework inspired by Functional Reactive Programming. It provides APIs for composing and transforming streams of values over time.
- Introduction
- Example: online search
- Objective-C and Swift
- How does ReactiveCocoa relate to Rx?
- Getting started
If you’re already familiar with functional reactive programming or what ReactiveCocoa is about, check out the Documentation folder for more in-depth information about how it all works. Then, dive straight into our documentation comments for learning more about individual APIs.
If you have a question, please see if any discussions in our GitHub issues or Stack Overflow have already answered it. If not, please feel free to file your own!
Many thanks to Rheinfabrik for generously sponsoring the development of ReactiveCocoa 3!
ReactiveCocoa is inspired by functional reactive
programming.
Rather than using mutable variables which are replaced and modified in-place,
RAC offers “event streams,” represented by the Signal
and
SignalProducer
types, that send values over time.
Event streams unify all of Cocoa’s common patterns for asynchrony and event handling, including:
- Delegate methods
- Callback blocks
NSNotification
s- Control actions and responder chain events
- Futures and promises
- Key-value observing (KVO)
Because all of these different mechanisms can be represented in the same way, it’s easy to declaratively chain and combine them together, with less spaghetti code and state to bridge the gap.
For more information about the concepts in ReactiveCocoa, see the Framework Overview.
Let’s say you have a text field, and whenever the user types something into it, you want to make a network request which searches for that query.
The first step is to observe edits to the text field, using a RAC extension to
UITextField
specifically for this purpose:
let searchStrings = textField.rac_textSignal().toSignalProducer()
|> map { text in text as! String }
This gives us a signal producer which sends
values of type String
. (The cast is currently
necessary to bridge
this extension method from Objective-C.)
With each string, we want to execute a network request. Luckily, RAC offers an
NSURLSession
extension for doing exactly that:
let searchResults = searchStrings
|> flatMap(.Latest) { query in
let URLRequest = self.searchRequestWithEscapedQuery(query)
return NSURLSession.sharedSession().rac_dataWithRequest(URLRequest)
}
|> map { data, URLResponse in
let string = String(data: data, encoding: NSUTF8StringEncoding)!
return parseJSONResultsFromString(string)
}
|> observeOn(UIScheduler())
This has transformed our producer of String
s into a producer of Array
s
containing the search results, which will be forwarded on the main thread
(thanks to the UIScheduler
).
Additionally, flatMap(.Latest)
here ensures that only one search—the
latest—is allowed to be running. If the user types another character while the
network request is still in flight, it will be cancelled before starting a new
one. Just think of how much code that would take to do by hand!
This won’t actually execute yet, because producers must be started in order to receive the results (which prevents doing work when the results are never used). That’s easy enough:
searchResults.start(next: { results in
println("Search results: \(results)")
})
Here, we watch for the Next
event, which contains our results, and
just log them to the console. This could easily do something else instead, like
update a table view or a label on screen.
In this example so far, any network error will generate an Error
event, which will terminate the event stream. Unfortunately, this
means that future queries won’t even be attempted.
To remedy this, we need to decide what to do with errors that occur. The quickest solution would be to log them, then ignore them:
|> flatMap(.Latest) { query in
let URLRequest = self.searchRequestWithEscapedQuery(query)
return NSURLSession.sharedSession().rac_dataWithRequest(URLRequest)
|> catch { error in
println("Network error occurred: \(error)")
return SignalProducer.empty
}
}
By replacing errors with the empty
event stream, we’re able to effectively
ignore them.
However, it’s probably more appropriate to retry at least a couple of times
before giving up. Conveniently, there’s a retry
operator to do exactly that!
Our improved searchResults
producer might look like this:
let searchResults = searchStrings
|> flatMap(.Latest) { query in
let URLRequest = self.searchRequestWithEscapedQuery(query)
return NSURLSession.sharedSession().rac_dataWithRequest(URLRequest)
|> retry(2)
|> catch { error in
println("Network error occurred: \(error)")
return SignalProducer.empty
}
}
|> map { data, URLResponse in
let string = String(data: data, encoding: NSUTF8StringEncoding)!
return parseJSONResultsFromString(string)
}
|> observeOn(UIScheduler())
Now, let’s say you only want to actually perform the search when the user pauses typing, to minimize traffic.
ReactiveCocoa has a declarative throttle
operator that we can apply to our
search strings:
let searchStrings = textField.rac_textSignal().toSignalProducer()
|> map { text in text as! String }
|> throttle(0.5, onScheduler: QueueScheduler.mainQueueScheduler)
This prevents values from being sent less than 0.5 seconds apart, so the user must stop editing for at least that long before we’ll use their search string.
To do this manually would require significant state, and end up much harder to read! With ReactiveCocoa, we can use just one operator to incorporate time into our event stream.
Although ReactiveCocoa was started as an Objective-C framework, as of version 3.0, all major feature development is concentrated on the Swift API.
RAC’s Objective-C API and Swift API are entirely separate, but there is a bridge to convert between the two. This is mostly meant as a compatibility layer for older ReactiveCocoa projects, or to use Cocoa extensions which haven’t been added to the Swift API yet.
The Objective-C API will continue to exist and be supported for the foreseeable future, but it won’t receive many improvements. For more information about using this API, please consult our legacy documentation.
We highly recommend that all new projects use the Swift API.
ReactiveCocoa was originally inspired, and therefore heavily influenced, by Microsoft’s Reactive Extensions (Rx) library. There are many ports of Rx, including RxSwift, but ReactiveCocoa is intentionally not a direct port.
Where RAC differs from Rx, it is usually to:
- Create a simpler API
- Address common sources of confusion
- More closely match Cocoa conventions
The following are some of the concrete differences, along with their rationales.
In most versions of Rx, Streams over time are known as Observable
s, which
parallels the Enumerable
type in .NET. Additionally, most operations in Rx.NET
borrow names from LINQ,
which uses terms reminiscient of relational databases, like Select
and Where
.
RAC is focused on matching Swift naming first and foremost, with terms like
map
and filter
instead. Other naming differences are typically inspired by
significantly better alternatives from Haskell or
Elm (which is the primary source for the “signal”
terminology).
One of the most confusing aspects of Rx is that of “hot”, “cold”, and “warm” observables (event streams).
In short, given just a method or function declaration like this, in C#:
IObservable<string> Search(string query)
… it is impossible to tell whether subscribing to (observing) that
IObservable
will involve side effects. If it does involve side effects, it’s
also impossible to tell whether each subscription has a side effect, or if only
the first one does.
This example is contrived, but it demonstrates a real, pervasive problem that makes it extremely hard to understand Rx code (and pre-3.0 ReactiveCocoa code) at a glance.
ReactiveCocoa 3.0 has solved this problem by distinguishing side
effects with the separate Signal
and SignalProducer
types. Although this
means there’s another type to learn about, it improves code clarity and helps
communicates intent much better.
In other words, ReactiveCocoa’s changes here are simple, not easy.
When signals and signal producers are allowed to error in ReactiveCocoa,
the kind of error must be specified in the type system. For example,
Signal<Int, NSError>
is a signal of integer values that may send an error of
type NSError
.
More importantly, RAC allows the special type NoError
to be used instead,
which statically guarantees that an event stream is not allowed to send an
error. This eliminates many bugs caused by unexpected error events.
In Rx systems with types, event streams only specify the type of their values—not the type of their errors—so this sort of guarantee is impossible.
Rx is basically agnostic as to how it’s used. Although UI programming with Rx is very common, it has few features tailored to that particular case.
RAC takes a lot of inspiration from ReactiveUI, including the basis for Actions.
Unlike ReactiveUI, which unfortunately cannot directly change Rx to make it more friendly for UI programming, ReactiveCocoa has been improved many times specifically for this purpose—even when it means diverging further from Rx.
ReactiveCocoa supports OS X 10.9+ and iOS 8.0+.
To add RAC to your application:
- Add the ReactiveCocoa repository as a submodule of your application’s repository.
- Run
script/bootstrap
from within the ReactiveCocoa folder. - Drag and drop
ReactiveCocoa.xcodeproj
into your application’s Xcode project or workspace. - On the “General” tab of your application target’s settings, add
ReactiveCocoa.framework
to the “Embedded Binaries” section.
Or, if you’re using Carthage, simply add
ReactiveCocoa to your Cartfile
:
github "ReactiveCocoa/ReactiveCocoa"
If you would prefer to use CocoaPods, there are some unofficial podspecs that have been generously contributed by third parties.
Once you’ve set up your project, check out the Framework Overview for a tour of ReactiveCocoa’s concepts, and the Basic Operators for some introductory examples of using it.