Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify that triples may be ignored/discarded #351

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

deeglaze
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixes #350

@@ -1506,6 +1506,8 @@ The CoRIM profile MUST provide a description of the expected Verifier behavior f

Verifier implementations MUST exhibit the same externally visible behavior as described in this specification.
They are not required to use the same internal representation or evaluation order described by this specification.
They are not required to implement support for all triples, profile permitting.
Copy link
Collaborator

@yogeshbdeshpande yogeshbdeshpande Dec 4, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
They are not required to implement support for all triples, profile permitting.
A Verifier might not implement all the Triples specified in this specification.
It depends on its Appraisal Policy for Evidence as mandated by its profile.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pending M T I work!

@@ -1506,6 +1506,8 @@ The CoRIM profile MUST provide a description of the expected Verifier behavior f

Verifier implementations MUST exhibit the same externally visible behavior as described in this specification.
They are not required to use the same internal representation or evaluation order described by this specification.
They are not required to implement support for all triples, profile permitting.
A Verifier MAY discard a triple based on policy.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
A Verifier MAY discard a triple based on policy.

@deeglaze
Copy link
Collaborator Author

deeglaze commented Dec 4, 2024

Discarding triples is left to later phases and not normative for up to phase 4.
Ignoring new triples is a matter of what is NTI, which @henkbirkholz is going to write what is NTI.

@deeglaze deeglaze closed this Dec 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Clarify that normative triples that the Verifier does not understand MAY be ignored
2 participants