Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Clarify that normative triples that the Verifier does not understand MAY be ignored #350

Open
deeglaze opened this issue Nov 27, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Clarify that normative triples that the Verifier does not understand MAY be ignored #350

deeglaze opened this issue Nov 27, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@deeglaze
Copy link
Collaborator

There will be extensions in later specs, and there are some heavy base spec triples that may not always be needed. We should state what the expected behavior is.
deeglaze added a commit to deeglaze/draft-ietf-rats-corim that referenced this issue Nov 27, 2024
@deeglaze
Clarify that triples may be ignored/discarded
bc2101b 
Fixes ietf-rats-wg#350

Signed-off-by: Dionna Glaze <[email protected]>
@deeglaze deeglaze mentioned this issue Nov 27, 2024
Closed
@thomas-fossati
Copy link
Collaborator

instead of saying in the negative, we should instead say what are the absolutely mandatory to implement triples

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Clarify that triples may be ignored/discarded deeglaze/draft-ietf-rats-corim
2 participants
@deeglaze @thomas-fossati