-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
basic setup #2
basic setup #2
Conversation
fixe #0
WalkthroughThe assimilation process has integrated diverse configurations and rules across multiple files, enhancing project integrity and efficiency. Updates encompass commit linting, code quality standards, and workflow automation for streamlined development. Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 4
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (32)
- .coderabbit.yaml (1 hunks)
- .commitlintrc.json (1 hunks)
- .dictionary.txt (1 hunks)
- .editorconfig (1 hunks)
- .eslintrc.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/FUNDING.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/dependabot.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/prace.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/pull_request_template.md (1 hunks)
- .github/release.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/codeql.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/commit-message.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/editorconfiglint.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/eslint.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/fta.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/greetings.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/knip.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/language-lint.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/license-check.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/mdlint.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/prace.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/pull-request-size.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/spellcheck.yml (1 hunks)
- .markdownlint.yaml (1 hunks)
- .npmrc (1 hunks)
- .spellcheckerrc.yml (1 hunks)
- CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md (1 hunks)
- CONTRIBUTING.md (1 hunks)
- SECURITY.md (1 hunks)
- package.json (1 hunks)
- renovate.json (1 hunks)
- tea.yaml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (26)
- .coderabbit.yaml
- .commitlintrc.json
- .editorconfig
- .eslintrc.yml
- .github/FUNDING.yml
- .github/dependabot.yml
- .github/prace.yml
- .github/release.yml
- .github/workflows/codeql.yml
- .github/workflows/editorconfiglint.yml
- .github/workflows/eslint.yml
- .github/workflows/fta.yml
- .github/workflows/greetings.yml
- .github/workflows/knip.yml
- .github/workflows/language-lint.yml
- .github/workflows/license-check.yml
- .github/workflows/mdlint.yml
- .github/workflows/prace.yml
- .github/workflows/spellcheck.yml
- .markdownlint.yaml
- .npmrc
- .spellcheckerrc.yml
- SECURITY.md
- package.json
- renovate.json
- tea.yaml
Additional comments not posted (3)
.github/workflows/commit-message.yml (1)
1-22
: The GitHub Actions workflow for commit message linting is well-configured and adheres to best practices..github/workflows/pull-request-size.yml (1)
1-27
: The GitHub Actions workflow for checking pull request size is well-configured and adheres to best practices..dictionary.txt (1)
1-109
: The dictionary is well-configured and includes a comprehensive list of terms relevant to the project.
@hussainnaqvee could you have a quick look at this one? Checks may fail, but I want to be sure not to break your code |
@Idrinth I have not tested |
The package.lock is not matching the package.json, will fix that later. In general |
fixe #0
fixe #0
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.json
is excluded by!**/package-lock.json
Files selected for processing (1)
- .eslintrc.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .eslintrc.yml
fixe #0
fixe #0
This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- .github/workflows/codeql.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/eslint.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/fta.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/knip.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- .github/workflows/codeql.yml
- .github/workflows/eslint.yml
- .github/workflows/fta.yml
- .github/workflows/knip.yml
fixe #0