Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

icetop effectivearea fix #14

Closed
wants to merge 16 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

kathrawlins
Copy link
Contributor

Second attempt at this pull request, after the accidental "upper-case I / lower-case I" branch confusion. Let's all commit to this one, to get it working!

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 6, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Files Coverage Δ
src/simweights/__init__.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/simweights/_icetop_weighter.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/simweights/_spatial.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/simweights/_weighter.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!.

@matthiasplum matthiasplum force-pushed the icetop_effectivearea_fix branch from 6d688be to 6d583de Compare October 23, 2023 13:45
kjmeagher pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 31, 2023
* Second try of fixing #14 started from a clean branch

* possible fix for the failing tests and removal of unnecessary object

* Update changelog with additional information for IceTop fix

* Update IceTop documentation with effective area information
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants