Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: The server acking an unset should clean the dirty flag. #116

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 25, 2024
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
63 changes: 63 additions & 0 deletions README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -104,6 +104,69 @@ See the [sample](https://github.com/homebound-team/form-state/blob/main/src/Form

# Features

## Incremental changedValue/dirty Management

In general, we have two types of forms:

- `autoSave` forms
- `submit` forms

### autoSave forms

For auto save forms, the expectation is that you should:

- Pass `useFormState` an `init.input` and `init.map` that updates the form-state from the initial GraphQL request & any cache updates
- Pass `useFormState` an `autoSave` lambda that calls your GraphQL mutation, using `changedValue`.
- Have your `save` mutation response return the acked/updated entity/fragment

```ts
autoSave: async () => {
const input = formState.changedValue;
await saveAuthor(input);
};
```

With these in place, we will correctly handle interleaved edits/saves, i.e.:

1. User changes `{ firstName: bob }`
2. We submit `{ id: 1, firstName: bob }` to the backend
3. While waiting for the response, the user sets `{ lastName: smith }`
4. The GraphQL mutation acks that `{ id: 1, firstName: bob }` is committed
5. The `init.map` updates `formState` to realize `firstName` is no longer dirty, but `lastName` keeps its WIP change
6. formState will trigger a 2nd `autoSave` for just the `lastName` change

### Submit forms

For submit forms, the expectation is that you should:

- Pass `useFormState` an `init.input` and `init.map` that updates the form-state from the initial GraphQL request & any cache updates
- In your `onClick` lambda, use `formState.changedValue` to call your GraphQL mutation
- Have your `save` mutation response return the acked/updated entity/fragment

If you do this, you should not have to call `commitChanges` manually, because code like:

```ts
onClick: async () => {
const input = formState.changedValue;
await saveAuthor(input);
// checks if formState.dirty is true before closing
closeModal();
};
```

Will "just work" because the control flow will be:

- User changes `{ firstName: bob }` and clicks Submit
- `onClick` runs and we submit `{ id: 1, firstName: bob }` to `saveAuthor`
- _Before_ the `await` promise resolves, the GraphQL response of `saveAuthor { ...AuthorFragment }` will:
- Update the apollo cache
- Re-render the `AuthorEditor` component with the new data
- Call `init.map` to update `formState` with the new data
- Realize the `firstName` is no longer dirty
- When `closeModal` runs, no "You have unsaved changes?" will appear

Basically, in a correctly-setup form, you should never have to call `commitChanges` manually, and doing so risks losing edits that the user made while any saves (either auto save or submit save) were in-flight.

## Fragments

Normally, form-state expects all fields in the form to be inputs to the GraphQL mutation/wire call. For example, the `author.firstName` field will always be submitted to the `saveAuthor` mutation (albeit with `author.changedValue` you can have `firstName` conditionally included).
Expand Down
3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion src/fields/valueField.ts
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -213,7 +213,8 @@ export function newValueFieldState<T, K extends keyof T>(
throw new Error(`${String(key)} is currently readOnly`);
}

if (opts.refreshing && this.dirty && this.value !== value) {
const isAckingUnset = this.value === null && (value === null || value === undefined);
if (opts.refreshing && this.dirty && this.value !== value && !isAckingUnset) {
// Ignore incoming values if we have changes (this.dirty) unless our latest change (this.value)
// matches the incoming value (value), b/c if it does we should accept it and reset originalValue
// so that we're no longer dirty.
Expand Down
9 changes: 8 additions & 1 deletion src/formState.test.tsx
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ import { autorun, isObservable, makeAutoObservable, observable, reaction } from
import { ObjectConfig } from "src/config";
import { f } from "src/configBuilders";
import { Fragment, ObjectState, createObjectState, fragment } from "src/fields/objectField";
import { FieldState } from "src/fields/valueField";
import { FieldState, InternalSetOpts } from "src/fields/valueField";
import { AuthorAddress, AuthorInput, BookInput, Color, DateOnly, dd100, dd200, jan1, jan2 } from "src/formStateDomain";
import { required } from "src/rules";

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -832,6 +832,13 @@ describe("formState", () => {
expect(a1.firstName.value).toBeNull();
expect(a1.originalValue.firstName).toBe("asdf");
expect(a1.firstName.dirty).toBeTruthy();
// And when the server acks as null
a1.set({ firstName: undefined }, { refreshing: true } as InternalSetOpts);
// Then it's no longer dirty
expect(a1.firstName.dirty).toBe(false);
expect(a1.firstName.originalValue).toBe(undefined);
expect(a1.firstName.value).toBe(undefined);
expect(a1.changedValue).toEqual({});
});

it("initializes null values to be undefined", () => {
Expand Down
Loading