Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Soft disable Service Provider promotions #873

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 8, 2024

Conversation

michaeldjeffrey
Copy link
Contributor

@michaeldjeffrey michaeldjeffrey commented Oct 8, 2024

Proto PR

The groundwork for Service Provider promotions is fine. Some of the finer details are still in flux.
This PR is disabling any part of service provider promotions that might be written to a public file that would lock us into those proto versions.

@michaeldjeffrey michaeldjeffrey force-pushed the mj/revert-referral-partially branch 2 times, most recently from 2faa21d to 72ab216 Compare October 8, 2024 16:21
@michaeldjeffrey michaeldjeffrey requested review from andymck, jeffgrunewald, macpie and bbalser and removed request for andymck October 8, 2024 16:36
Cargo.toml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
In it's current form service provider promotions is not being released
yet. This is all the code that deals with promotion rewards in a mobile
reward share.
- do not write sp allocations to reward manifest.
- always return nothing from the database when asking for promotion
  rewards

These two things will effectively keep promotion rewards from being
released. The Service Provider Reward calculations will continue as
planned thinking there are no promotio rewards to give out.
@michaeldjeffrey michaeldjeffrey merged commit 5d16871 into main Oct 8, 2024
17 checks passed
@michaeldjeffrey michaeldjeffrey deleted the mj/revert-referral-partially branch October 8, 2024 20:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants