-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Expand on trace #3
Expand on trace #3
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for making these changes @melanieclarke! I just had two small questions, otherwise I'm happy to merge this in as is.
A question for you -- do you think we should rename trace_offset to position_offset? I'm wondering if "trace" is confusing, since it's also applied to background regions. |
I'd be up for changing it, especially now that it's more generally applicable. position_offset sounds fine, the only other idea I had was something like aperture_offset since it will offset all apertures? |
Okay, thanks, I can update that too. Unless you object, I think I like position_offset better, by analogy to the existing use_source_posn parameter. I'm not sure the background regions are consistently understood as "apertures". |
Nope, no strong preference, position_offset is fine with me. |
Okay, done! |
Thanks again I'll merge this in and update add some documentation updates! |
Proposal to expand trace-based extraction to all use_source_posn cases.
A couple things to note:
Let me know what you think - I'm eager to get something like this in because it folds in nicely with the work we're doing for optimal extraction. In particular, with these changes, I can get the optimal extraction we developed for MIRI LRS working with a toy NIRSpec PSF model very straightforwardly.