Add community edition license for Teleport 16+ #41054
Conversation
|
The PR changelog entry failed validation: Changelog entry not found in the PR body. Please add a "no-changelog" label to the PR, or changelog lines starting with |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
FYI @fheinecke @camscale this is the file that we should distribute in the tarballs and deb/rpm packages for OSS starting with Teleport 16.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is there a license file we'd want to include in the enterprise artifacts for symmetry, or do we just leave it out?
I don't think we include a license file at all in any of the release artifacts. Should we add this license to more than just tarballs and deb/rpm packages? MacOS packages? OCI images, AMIs, whatever we do for WIndows?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't think we include a license file at all in any of the release artifacts.
We definitely do, in tarballs at least. We also have the license field of debs (and maybe rpms) set.
zmb3
added
the
no-changelog
|
Shouldn't this have a changelog entry for v16? This is a pretty major change. Are we going to include notice of this with the v16 release in some other way? |
Yes, this is not the kind of item I want to be included as a small bullet-point in an auto-generated changelog. For major releases Roman I collaborate on a Google doc with complete release notes. (Additionally, the UI in Teleport 16 will make it impossible for users to miss this change) |
See https://goteleport.com/blog/teleport-community-license/ for details of this announcement.
public-teleport-github-review-bot
bot
removed request for
klizhentas,
tcsc and
TMG63
See https://goteleport.com/blog/teleport-community-license/ for details of this announcement.