Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 16, 2022. It is now read-only.

write community guidelines #71

Closed
chadwhitacre opened this issue Jun 30, 2014 · 16 comments
Closed

write community guidelines #71

chadwhitacre opened this issue Jun 30, 2014 · 16 comments

Comments

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor

Reticketed from #66.

Over on gratipay/gratipay.com#1425 we're talking about guidelines for content published by users on Gittip. We also need guidelines for participation in the Gittip community as a discussant/collaborator, so I'm ticketing that as a separate issue here.

Open-source Codes of Conduct are the starting-point:

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor Author

See #66 for conversation to date, but new discussion should happen over here.

@chadwhitacre chadwhitacre changed the title Write Community Guidelines write community guidelines Jun 30, 2014
@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor Author

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor Author

Great article from Ada Initiative last week re: dealing with code of conduct violations:

"Handling harassment incidents swiftly and safely"
https://adainitiative.org/2014/07/handling-harassment-incidents-swiftly-and-safely/

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor Author

See also:

"The Insidious Power of Not-Quite-Harassment"
https://medium.com/@hannahjwaters/the-insidious-power-of-not-quite-harassment-857e2f71059a

Sexual harassment often goes unreported because of fear: fear of retribution, fear of losing friends, fear of professional backlash, fear that no one will believe you. When someone we know is accused, it’s far easier to defend them out of disbelief that they “could ever do something like that” than to believe the claims of a stranger. Yet we say to ourselves that if we were victimized, or if we saw someone else who was, we would be the ones to speak out. We would stand up, be bold, demand respect and take down the world’s harassers one by one.

But then it happens to you. And you don’t know what to do.

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor Author

My current thinking is that we should adopt Ada Initiative templates for a) Code of Conduct and b) Incident Response, and then think about additional, optional layers beyond that. Because, yes: we should explicitly prioritize a safe environment over, for example, the wholesale sharing of information.

maslow s_hierarchy_of_needs svg

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor Author

Interpersonal encounter—especially despite great differences—is a central value and goal for me. Openness to each other.

Safety is a prerequisite for genuine interpersonal encounter.

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor Author

Picking up from #76 ...

I feel a space can be made safe for every person, but not for every idea.

(That's @duckinator in "On Open Companies, Consent, and Safety (among other things).")

Hmm ... I would be more inclined to say "but not for every behavior," because focusing on behavior "takes the conflict out of the realm of values and concepts — 'is it okay to hug people without consent?' — and into the realm of facts — 'is this person hugging people without consent?'" (src). In general I'm reluctant to rule out ideas a priori, though the manner in which ideas are delivered would be a form of behavior, and I think we want to be clear about what tone is appropriate in Gittip spaces.

Can you give some examples of ideas that you would see as being on Gittip's "unofficial list" of banned ideas, @duckinator?

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor Author

and then think about additional, optional layers beyond that

Here I'm thinking of double opt-in processes for open handling of both condemnation (delivering results of an incident investigation to the wrongdoer) and reconciliation (facilitating a process of apology, forgiveness, and reparation between wronged and wrongdoer).

I do also want to think through "Some Thoughts on Handling Harassment and Toxic Behavior Privately." How does that relate here?

chadwhitacre added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 31, 2014
Places primary emphasis on safety, with direct communication, behavior
change, and reconciliation as secondary concerns.
@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor Author

See what you think of that revision, eh @duckinator @pjf et al.?

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor Author

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor Author

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor Author

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'd like to change the "conflict team" to the "safety team" and use [email protected]

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'd like to change the "conflict team" to the "safety team" and use [email protected]

Done. What else do we need on this?

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant