-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 308
run Gittip 98 #2290
Comments
43 accounts reviewed. One marked suspicious: https://www.gittip.com/galim7771/ Two left unreviewed (cf. last week, #2268): https://www.gittip.com/ejuhlin/ |
Backup taken and verified. |
Droplet spun up and updated. |
Script started. |
|
Repro'd locally with this script: #!/usr/bin/env python
from gittip import wireup
db = wireup.db(wireup.env())
db._check_paydays_volumes() |
The self-check is saying that during the last payday we recorded a charge volume of 11,079.68 in the Hypothesis: those charges were made manually and weren't actually part of payday even though they happened during payday. |
I see two exchanges manually recorded by @bruceadams on April 16, but that's outside of last payday. |
Got it! There are two more manually recorded entries from @bruceadams that did occur during payday. The payday check should be updated to exclude entries with a non-null recorder. |
Script restarted using |
Script ran for {age} (1:56:40.881698). |
Tweet tweeted on Twitter. |
Log downloaded. |
Droplet destroyed. |
It looks like Balanced's CC failed this week. I mentioned this to @steveklabnik in IRC (Botbot's down) |
We re-stocked the card with funds. @seanlinsley thought there might be a need to re-enter the card, is that true? |
@steveklabnik No need to reenter the card. We'll try it again this week. :-) |
MassPay done and escrow shuffled. |
97
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: