-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 950
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Issue 12142 #12148
base: 5.1.x
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Issue 12142 #12148
Conversation
// right now grails also breaks it up by also adding: | ||
// "[a[0]:[b:1], a[1]:[b:2]]" | ||
// Personally, I think that's useless, but whether you want to retain it, I don't know. | ||
assert params != null |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
asserting that params
is not null may not make sense here. In order for it to be null, the new GrailsParameterMap(request)
would have to return null, and then a NullPointerException
would have been thrown at line 504 I think. Is that correct?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sounds reasonable, I was just following the existing pattern.
@xpusostomos Thank you for taking time to send this pull request. I am a little confused that whether this is about adding a test for functionality which currently does not work? or it is just an addition of new test whereas the functionality is working fine? |
I raised an issue where I think grails should behave differently. I was asked to provide a pull request for a test case for how I think it should work. This I did here. |
See: #12142 (comment)