Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 10, 2023. It is now read-only.

Implement discard and remove function #19

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

pymia
Copy link

@pymia pymia commented Sep 13, 2017

No description provided.

@googlebot
Copy link

Thanks for your pull request. It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please visit https://cla.developers.google.com/ to sign.

Once you've signed, please reply here (e.g. I signed it!) and we'll verify. Thanks.


  • If you've already signed a CLA, it's possible we don't have your GitHub username or you're using a different email address. Check your existing CLA data and verify that your email is set on your git commits.
  • If your company signed a CLA, they designated a Point of Contact who decides which employees are authorized to participate. You may need to contact the Point of Contact for your company and ask to be added to the group of authorized contributors. If you don't know who your Point of Contact is, direct the project maintainer to go/cla#troubleshoot.
  • In order to pass this check, please resolve this problem and have the pull request author add another comment and the bot will run again.

@pymia
Copy link
Author

pymia commented Sep 13, 2017

I signed it!

@googlebot
Copy link

We found a Contributor License Agreement for you (the sender of this pull request), but were unable to find agreements for the commit author(s). If you authored these, maybe you used a different email address in the git commits than was used to sign the CLA (login here to double check)? If these were authored by someone else, then they will need to sign a CLA as well, and confirm that they're okay with these being contributed to Google.
In order to pass this check, please resolve this problem and have the pull request author add another comment and the bot will run again.

@pymia pymia force-pushed the implement_discard_and_remove_function branch from a638b6a to fd72748 Compare September 13, 2017 12:37
@googlebot
Copy link

CLAs look good, thanks!

Copy link
Contributor

@mina86 mina86 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This also needs tests and documentation. And some good documentation because semantics of removing elements from a prefix set aren’t obvious. For example, what should be the result of the following:

ps = pygtrie.PrefixSet(factory=pygtrie.StringTrie)
ps.add('foo/bar/baz')
assert 'foo/bar/baz/qux' in ps
ps.remove('foo/bar/baz/qux')  # Should it throw?
'foo/bar/baz/qux' in ps  # Is this True?

try:
node, _ = self._get_node(key)
except:
pass
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Clearly, this pass should be return, no?

try:
node, _ = self._get_node(key)
except KeyError:
return 0
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Uh? Why are you catching the exception? It should be propagated.

More importantly, why are you duplicating the implementation? It’s much better to implement discard in terms of remove, i.e.:

    def remove(self, key):
        …

    def discard(self, key):
        try:
            self.remove(key)
        except KeyError:
            pass

except:
pass

if node and node.children:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don’t understand why you have this special case. node.children = {} is enough to remove all the children, you don’t have to iterate over them.

self.discard(child)
else:
node.children = {}
node.value = _SENTINEL
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This leaves out empty nodes which don’t lead to anything. For example, if you first add foo/bar/baz you get a prefix set with three nodes:

foo → bar → baz

Only baz’s value is set. If you now remove foo/bar you end up with an empty set which nonetheless has two nodes:

foo → bar

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants