Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add viper provider for xload #32

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 11, 2024
Merged

feat: add viper provider for xload #32

merged 3 commits into from
Jan 11, 2024

Conversation

ajatprabha
Copy link
Contributor

Adds an xload.Loader implementation for github.com/spf13/viper

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jan 9, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (0020145) 98.97% compared to head (7943c42) 99.03%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #32      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   98.97%   99.03%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files          35       38       +3     
  Lines         781      826      +45     
==========================================
+ Hits          773      818      +45     
  Misses          8        8              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ajatprabha ajatprabha requested a review from sonnes January 9, 2024 05:27
@sonnes
Copy link
Collaborator

sonnes commented Jan 11, 2024

Not urgent. Can you add examples for all the config options

@sonnes
Copy link
Collaborator

sonnes commented Jan 11, 2024

Rest LGTM

@ajatprabha ajatprabha merged commit 26d32ad into main Jan 11, 2024
4 checks passed
@ajatprabha ajatprabha deleted the xload-viper branch January 11, 2024 04:57
@ajatprabha ajatprabha mentioned this pull request Jan 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants