Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use distribution of mpy-cross as default for %mpy-cross command #27

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

andrewleech
Copy link
Contributor

So I've gone and made an auto-compiler for mpy-cross:
https://gitlab.com/alelec/mpy_cross

It builds copies of mpy-cross for osx, linux (32 and 64 bit) and windows (32 and 64 bit).
Every micropython tag and master once a week.

Tag releases are bundled into python wheels and released on pypi, ready for use here :-)
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/mpy-cross

This PR brings in mpy_cross as a dependency and then uses the bundled binary by default.
This can still be overridden with the original set-exe if needed.

Also now supports '*' in filename to run on multiple files

Also support '*' in filename to run on multiple files
@goatchurchprime
Copy link
Owner

How did you solve this problem? micropython/micropython#3410

@andrewleech
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ah, well it's not exactly solved... however my builder has released copies for all tagged builds of micropython.

As such, if you're using an old version of micropython you could install a matching version of mpy-cross.

Similarly if there's a new syntax change in master, I've got regular builds from master available on the gitlab page, so you could an update.

I don't have any method in place to detect when an incorrect version is used however with the current versions it should tell us itself? micropython/micropython#3357 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants