Future of this module #13
Conversation
This commit was used to remove all style errors. Removed non standard files Removed all unit test because they contained too much style errors, will be added in later commits.
This is a breaking change Some configuration has been removed, because it is not recommended Also rewrote spec test for changed classes
Breaking change! With check_mk and other OSses switching to systemd inetx is not being used anymore
|
Maybe Vox Pupuli could help? |
|
@zyronix thx for the work. Also as @alexjfisher said, if voxpopuli want to maintain it, I'm also fine with it. Best, |
|
Sorry for my somewhat delayed response. |
|
@jrevillard How would you like to proceed? |
|
@alexjfisher if you find somebody from Vox Populy to fork this repo then I will mark it deprecated and redirect to the new repo. |
|
@jrevillard Alex is a member of Voxpupuli, they forked the module and awaiting some minor changes before the initial pupuli release will be done. See: |
|
Ok the module is now marked as deprecated. Should I put it read only or do you want me to merge this PR ? |
Hi there,
This module has not been updated for a year . Still I love it and I have been working on getting Puppet 5 & 6 support for it. As well as I have been working on support for debian 8 & 9 (as well as ubuntu), add PDK support and RHEL support (6&7).
I am wondering what your plans are for the future of this module. Are you planning to keep it? Support it? In my opinion it is quite hard to find a good module for check_mk on the forge. There are roughly 10 modules which all do something with check_mk or omd. So lets clear up to noise and deprecate those modules.
I would like to hear your opinion about this.
This Pull request is still WIP, because I could not find any contact details on the project page this is my attempt to connect with you.