WordNet Quoting #1021
Merged
WordNet Quoting #1021
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Core WordNet had this convention while quoting within definitions or examples:
This is not ideal (and I will later propose another scheme leaving the apostrophe to its original function, namely to ellipsize characters).
The number of quotations departing from this rule is quite limited for now and they're easy to correct.
This PR enforces the consistent, uniform application of the original WN quotation `xxx' scheme, a prerequisite for any change.
Incidentally, this will make any processing easier.