Rust: Initial SSA implementation #17713
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
|
|
||
| /** Same as `lastRefRedef`, but skips uncertain reads. */ | ||
| pragma[nomagic] | ||
| private predicate lastRefSkipUncertainReadsExt(DefinitionExt def, BasicBlock bb, int i) { |
Check warning
Code scanning / CodeQL
Missing QLDoc for parameter Warning
hvitved
force-pushed
the
rust/ssa
branch
8 times, most recently
from
ca73280 to
5215568
Compare
hvitved
force-pushed
the
rust/ssa
branch
3 times, most recently
from
10c8fee to
6a792a4
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds an initial static single assignment (SSA) library to Rust.
In this first version, we restrict the analysis to variables that are either immutable, or mutable with the following constraints:
& mut xor implicitly as a method call receiverx.foo().We may be able to relax these constraints, but that will be done follow-up.