Implement agent time recording and reporting to playground v2

[satococoa]

Summary

Implement these changes into v2(current) playground.

• Save agent activities to the database #190
• Send meterEvent to Stripe (Agent v1) #238

Testing

• agentActivities and agentTimeUsageReports are successfully saved
• Stripe receives meter events.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
giselle	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Dec 19, 2024 2:23am

[shige]

@satococoa Cloud you fix the CI error?

[satococoa]

This change was made to avoid unnecessary initialization in testing and specific runtime environments, and to enable more flexible module mocking.
Previously, the Stripe instance was initialized immediately upon module import, causing errors during tests without an API key and making it difficult to mock.

By switching to lazy initialization — deferring the actual Stripe setup until the first time it’s accessed — we can now skip initialization during testing or easily swap in mock instances. As a result, our code becomes more testable, maintainable, and adaptable.

As an alternative, I also considered introducing vitest to leverage its advanced module mocking capabilities whith bun:test doesn't have.
However, transitioning to a different test framework would involve a large scope of changes, so I decided to postpone that option for now.

The lazy initialization approach provides a simpler, more incremental improvement to address our current needs.

[satococoa]

@toyamarinyon
I've merged the retry mechanism from the main branch into this feature branch.

Could you please:

1. Review the changes
2. Verify that the retry recording agent properly integrates with the retry mechanism

Changes made:

• Merge main branch and integrated retry mechanism.
• Updated recording agent implementation

Thank you for your time.

[toyamarinyon]

Verify that the retry recording agent properly integrates with the retry mechanism

Please tell me what and how do I verify it? Reviewing code? If should I do some operations, please let me know that.

[toyamarinyon]

I would like to separate the recording of the execution from the context of the execution, so it would be better to make it a callback like onFinishPerformFlowExecution and add props like onFinishPerformFlowExecutionAction in the Provider. I think, but in this Pull request, it is fine as it is.

[toyamarinyon]

Sorry. I thought I had commented on it, but it was Approve, so I will redo it.

[shige]

LGTM! ⏲️

[toyamarinyon]

Why am I meant to have approved 🤔?

[satococoa]

@toyamarinyon

Please tell me what and how do I verify it? Reviewing code? If should I do some operations, please let me know that.

Sorry for any confusion, simply I want you to re-review code. (Because conflict has occurred.)

---

Conflicts is happening again, I'll fix it and request re-review again.

[satococoa]

@toyamarinyon

I've resolved the merge conflicts.
Could you please check that your changes are correctly preserved?

[toyamarinyon]

Thank you for resolving the conflict so many times!