Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Show correct simulation name in reports (local runs) #87

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

guilgaly
Copy link
Member

Draft - depends on gatling/gatling-private#1033


Motivation:

Local run reports currently show the name of the Java adapter class instead of the simulation name.

Modifications:

Override simulation name with the correct name.

Result:

Reports show the expected simulation name (derived from the simulation file name).

Motivation:

Local run reports currently show the name of the Java adapter class instead of the simulation name.

Modifications:

Override simulation name with the correct name.

Result:

Reports show the expected simulation name (derived from the simulation file name).
@guilgaly guilgaly self-assigned this Nov 19, 2024
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ val compilerRelease = 21
val graalvmJdkVersion = "23.0.0"
val graalvmJsVersion = "24.1.1"
val coursierVersion = "2.1.12"
val gatlingVersion = "3.13.1"
val gatlingVersion = "3.13.2-SNAPSHOT"
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Awaiting final version

@guilgaly
Copy link
Member Author

Closed as not necessary, we ended up just using the existing system property. Upgrading to the new Gatling version will be enough.

@guilgaly guilgaly closed this Nov 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants