✅ Fees : Transfers are about 4~ MGX
✅ Fees : UPD You can no longer pay fees to KSM
✅ Fees : UPD You can no longer pay fees to TUR

AssetRegistry RPC -
  ✅ GIVEN a token that does not exist on the asset registry THEN it won't be returned in RPC
  ✅ GIVEN a token that does exist on the asset registry AND name is empty and symbol is empty and operation disabled is not set THEN it won't be returned in RPC
  ✅ GIVEN a token that does exist on the asset registry AND name is not empty and symbol is empty and operation disabled is not set THEN it won't be returned in RPC
  ✅ GIVEN a token that does exist on the asset registry AND name is not empty and symbol is not empty and operation disabled is not set THEN its returned in RPC
  ✅ GIVEN a token that does exist on the asset registry AND name is not empty and symbol is not empty and operation disabled is false THEN its returned in RPC
  ✅ GIVEN a token that does exist on the asset registry AND name is not empty and symbol is not empty and operation disabled is true THEN its not returned in RPC
  ✅ GIVEN a token that belongs to a pool WHEN pool is not disabled THEN the token is not filtered

✅ gasless- GIVEN a feeLock configured WHEN a swap happens THEN fees are not charged but locked instead
✅ gasless- GIVEN a correct config for gasless swaps WHEN the user runs unlock-fee THEN fees are not charged for token unlockFee
✅ gasless- High-value swaps are rejected from the txn pool if they would fail before the percentage fee is charged
✅ gasless- For low-value swaps, token reservation status and pallet storage are altered in accordance with the timeout mechanism
✅ gasless- High-value swaps when successful are not charged txn fee or token locked, but the percentage fee is charged

❌ gasless- isFree depends on the token and the sell valuation
	Error: expect(received).toBeTruthy()
❌ gasless- isFree works same as multiswap of two
	Error: expect(received).toBeTruthy()

✅ gasless- Given a feeLock correctly configured WHEN the user swaps two tokens defined in the thresholds AND swapValue > threshold THEN the extrinsic is correctly submitted AND No locks AND no fees
❌ gasless- Given a feeLock correctly configured WHEN the user swaps two tokens defined in the thresholds AND the user has enough MGAs AND swapValue < threshold THEN some MGAs will be locked
	Error: thrown: "Tx([0x4deff8d71fb0074f4aabced6ac68bdb78eb8c0fbb0a96b166fe0b3c5176ea241]) Transaction error"
❌ gasless- Given a feeLock correctly configured WHEN the user swaps two tokens that are not defined in the thresholds AND the user has not enough MGAs AND swapValue > threshold THEN the extrinsic can not be submited
	Error: expect(received).rejects.toThrow(expected)

❌ gasless- GIVEN some locked tokens and no more free MGX WHEN another tx is submitted AND lock period did not finished THEN the operation can not be submitted
	Error: expect(received).rejects.toThrow(expected)
✅ gasless- GIVEN some locked tokens and no more free MGX WHEN another tx is submitted AND lock period finished THEN the operation can be submitted ( unlock before locking )
✅ gasless- GIVEN some locked tokens WHEN querying accountFeeLockData THEN the amount matches with locked tokens AND lastFeeLockBlock matches with the block when tokens were locked
✅ gasless- GIVEN some locked tokens and lastFeeLockBlock is lower than current block WHEN release feeLock is requested THEN the tokens are unlocked
✅ gasless- GIVEN a lock WHEN the period is N THEN the tokens can not be unlocked before that period

✅ [gasless] Happy path: automatic-unlock

Identity pallet tests: Main use cases
  ✅ Check setter & getters for identity pallet and reserves 5k mgas
  ✅ Check that a user can unset the name with identity pallet and tokens are unreserved
  ✅ Check that a user can sub one address

Tests with Metamask signing: Test that with current data, txs can be signed
  ✅ GIVEN sign extrinsic by using privateKey of another ethUser THEN receive error
  ✅ Transfer tokens with an incorrect chainId - must fail
  ✅ Transfer tokens
  ✅ Mint liquidity
  ✅ Burn liquidity
  ✅ Create batch function

Rolldown withdraw error
  ✅ withdrawing token which does not exist should return correct error

SDK tests for rpc functions
  ✅ Calculate Sell / buy / id
  ✅ Get Burn amount , maxInstant burn amount
  ✅ Calculate balanced sell amount

Tips - Tips are not allowed for swaps
  ✅ multiswapSellAsset tips operations are forbidden
  ✅ multiswapBuyAsset tips operations are forbidden
  ✅ transfer tips operations are allowed
  ✅ mint tips operations are allowed

✅ xyk-pallet - Assets substracted are incremented by 1 - SellAsset

✅ xyk-pallet - Calculate required MGA fee - CreatePool
✅ xyk-pallet - Calculate required MGA fee - BuyAsset

xyk-pallet - Burn liquidity tests: BurnLiquidity Errors:
  ✅ Burn liquidity assets that does not belong to any pool
  ✅ Burn liquidity  for more assets than the liquidity pool has issued
  ✅ Burn someone else liquidities

xyk-pallet - Burn liquidity tests: when burning liquidity you can
  ✅ Get affected after a transaction that devaluates X wallet & pool states with [0,0]
  ✅ Burning liquidities provides Burn and settle
  ✅ Burning liquidities generates a Liquidity burned event

xyk-pallet - Buy assets tests: BuyAssets Errors:
  ✅ Buy assets that does not belong to any pool
  ❌ Buy more assets than exists in the pool
	Error: expect(received).toEqual(expected) // deep equality
  ❌ Buy all assets from the the pool
	Error: expect(received).toEqual(expected) // deep equality
  ❌ Buy assets with a high expectation: maxInput -1
	Error: Expected: 1253911134
xyk-pallet - Buy assets tests: Buying assets you can
  ✅ Leave only one asset in the pool
  ❌ Buy from a wallet I own into a wallet I do not own
	Error:   --- TX Mapping issue ---

xyk-pallet -
  ✅ User can pay a Tx with only MGA
  ✅ User can pay a Tx with only ETH
✅ User can't pay a Tx with only Arbitrum-Eth
✅ GIVEN User has enough GASP & enough ETH THEN Fees are charged in GASP
✅ GIVEN User has a very limited amount of GASP & enough ETH THEN Fees are charged in ETH
✅ GIVEN User has a very limited GASP & a very limited ETH AND we have GASP-tok1 pool WHEN the Tx is a swap tok1 to tok2 above the “threshold” THEN operation succeed
❌ GIVEN User has a very limited GASP & a very limited ETH AND we have GASP-tok1 pool WHEN the Tx is a swap tok2 to tok1 above the “threshold” THEN operation succeed
	Error: thrown: Object {
❌ GIVEN User has a very limited amount of GASP & a minimal amount of Eth AND the Tx is a swap below the “threshold” THEN we receive client error
	Error: expect(received).toContain(expected) // indexOf
✅ User, when paying with eth, have to pay 1/30000 eth per GASP spent.

xyk-pallet - Mint liquidity tests: MintLiquidity Errors:
  ✅ Mint liquidity when not enough assetY for minting Xamount
  ✅ Mint liquidity when not enough assetX for minting Yamount
  ✅ Mint liquidity assets that does not belong to any pool
  ✅ Mint liquidity more assets than I own
  ✅ Min liquidity, SecondAssetAmount parameter expectation not met

xyk-pallet - Mint liquidity tests: with minting you can
  ✅ Add all the wallet assets to the pool
  ✅ Expect an event when liquidity is minted

xyk-pallet - Check operations are not executed because of overflow in asset token
  ✅ Create pool of [MAX,MAX]: OverFlow [a+b] - liquidityAsset calculation
  ✅ Minting Max+1 tokens operation fails
  ⚪ Transfer [MAX] assets to other user when that user has 1 asset. Max+1 => overflow.
xyk-pallet - Operate with a pool close to overflow
  ✅ Sell [MAX -2] assets to a wallet with Max-1000,1000 => overflow.
  ✅ Buy [100] assets to a wallet with Max-1000,1000 => overflow.
  ⚪ Mint liquidities [1000] assets to a wallet with Max-1000,1000 => overflow.
  ⚪ [BUG] Burn liquidities [MAX -1] assets to a wallet wich is full => overflow. NOT  a bug https://trello.com/c/J3fzuwH5
xyk-pallet - Operate with a user account close to overflow
  ⚪ Sell a few assets to a wallet that is full => overflow. NOT A BUG: https://trello.com/c/J3fzuwH5
  ⚪ Buy a few assets to a wallet that is full  => overflow. NOT A BUG: https://trello.com/c/J3fzuwH5
xyk-pallet - Operate with a highly unbalanced pool [mg - newAsset]
  ⚪ [BUG] Buy a few assets to a wallet linked to MGA  => overflow.

✅ GIVEN a paymentInfo request, WHEN extrinsic is sellAsset THEN non-zero is returned
✅ GIVEN a paymentInfo request, WHEN extrinsic is multiswapBuyAsset THEN non-zero is returned
✅ GIVEN a paymentInfo request, WHEN extrinsic is mintLiquidityEvent THEN non-zero is returned
⚪ GIVEN a paymentInfo request, WHEN extrinsic is compoundRewards THEN non-zero is returned
⚪ GIVEN a paymentInfo request, WHEN extrinsic is provideLiquidityWithId THEN non-zero is returned
✅ GIVEN a paymentInfo request, WHEN extrinsic is a batch with a sell/buy operation THEN non-zero is returned AND the extrinsic will fail because sell/buy are forbidden in batches tx

xyk-pallet - Poll creation: Errors:
  ✅ Create x-y and y-x pool
  ✅ Create pool with zero
  ✅ Not enough assets
xyk-pallet - Pool tests: a pool can:
  ✅ be minted
  ✅ be burn
xyk-pallet - Pool opeations: Simmetry
  ✅ GetBalance x-y and y-x pool
  ✅ Minting x-y and y-x pool
  ✅ Burning x-y and y-x pool
  ✅ GetLiquidityAssetID x-y and y-x pool

xyk-pallet - Vested token tests: which action you can do with vesting token
  ✅ xyk-pallet- check that vested liqidity tokens can not be used for burning or transfering
  ✅ xyk-pallet- check that unlocking tokens are free to use when the relock time is done
  ✅ xyk-pallet- check that all unlocking vesting tokens can be burned
  ✅ xyk-pallet- check that if pool not promoted then the extrinsic failed

⚪ Function provideLiquidityWithConversion does not work with non-mga paired token
⚪ A user without any liq token, can use provideLiquidityWithConversion to mint some tokens.
⚪ A user without any liq token, can use provideLiquidityWithConversion to mint some tokens on a promoted pool.
⚪ A user who uses provideLiquidityWithConversion and other who do manually a swap + mint, gets the similar ratio of liquidity tokens.

xyk-pallet - Sell assets tests: SellAsset Errors:
  ✅ Sell assets that does not belong to any pool
  ✅ Try sell more assets than owned
  ❌ Sell assets with a high expectation: limit +1
	Error:   --- TX Mapping issue ---
xyk-pallet - Sell assets tests: Selling Assets you can
  ✅ Sell assets with a high expectation: limit - OK
  ✅ Sell assets from a wallet I own into a wallet I do not own: limit

Wallets unmodified
  ✅ xyk-pallet - User Balance - Creating a pool requires paying fees
  ✅ xyk-pallet - User Balance - mint liquidity requires paying fees
❌ xyk-pallet - User Balance - Selling an asset does not require paying fees
	TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'find')
✅ xyk-pallet - User Balance - Buying an asset does not require paying fees

xyk-pallet - treasury tests [No Mangata]: on treasury we store
  ✅ assets won when assets are sold - 5 [no connected to MGA]
  ✅ assets won when assets are sold - 1 [rounding] [no connected to MGA]
  ✅ assets won when assets are bought - 2 [no connected to MGA]
  ✅ assets won when assets are bought - 1 [no connected to MGA]

❌ xyk-pallet - AssetsOperation: buyAsset [maxAmountIn = 1M], buy asset
	Error: expect(received).toEqual(expected) // deep equality
✅ xyk-pallet - AssetsOperation: buyAsset [maxAmountIn = 1M], sell a bought asset

✅ register new asset from sudo user
✅ try to register a new asset from non-sudo user, expect to fail
✅ register new asset and then update it by sudo user
✅ register new asset and then update it by non sudo user, expect to fail
❌ register new asset and then update it without fee
	Error: thrown: "Tx([0xa44ad71c4995ba8e82db62746c7dc621a410903083df0e29b56324f557cb867d]) Transaction error"
✅ register asset and then try to register new one with the same assetId, expect to conflict
✅ register asset with xyk disabled and try to create a pool, expect to fail
✅ register asset with xyk undefined and try to create a pool, expect success
✅ register asset with xyk enabled and try to create a pool, expect success

✅ xyk-pallet - AssetsOperation: sellAsset [minAmountOut = 0] , first to second currency
✅ xyk-pallet - AssetsOperation: sellAsset [minAmountOut = 0], sell an already sold asset

✅ xyk-pallet - AssetsOperation: transferAsset
✅ xyk-pallet - AssetsOperation: transferAll

✅ Asset can be created by a sudo user
✅ Asset can't be created by a regular user
✅ GIVEN Create one asset with the same address but different chains THEN Operations pass
✅ GIVEN Create one asset with the same address and same chain THEN Operation fail
✅ GIVEN 2 assets which have been created by registerAsset and registerL1Asset THEN Their IDs are consistent
update L1AssetData-
  ✅ Asset can be updated by a sudo user
  ✅ Asset can't be updated by a regular user
  ✅ GIVEN Update asset so that addresses match but chains are different from existing ones THEN Operation pass
  ✅ GIVEN Update asset so so that addresses & chain matches with some existing ones THEN Operation fail
  ✅ GIVEN An asset created by registerAsset AND It has been updated by updateL1Asset THEN It is now accessible through IdToL1Asset

✅ xyk-pallet - Liqudity : Burn part of the liquidity
✅ xyk-pallet - Liqudity : Burn all the liquidity
✅ xyk-pallet - LiquidityOperation: mintLiquidity

MPL: Delegator
  ✅ join as delegator > verify account balances are reserved +  mpl storage
MPL: Collators
  ✅ join as collator > verify account balances are reserved + mpl checks
  ✅ join as collator + activate  > acount balances are reserved + mpl checks
MPL: Collators - Activated liq
  ✅ join as collator with activated liq. > verify account balances are reserved + mpl checks

Vesting-native
  ✅ As a user, I can use MGX vested to move tokens to MPL pallet
  ✅ As a user, I can use MGX vested from MPL to staking
  ✅ As a user, I can revert MGX vested from MPL to vesting pallet

Vesting
  ✅ As a user, I can use vested tokens to mint
  ✅ As a user, I can activate vesting-minted tokens only if reserved

✅ xyk-pallet - Pool tests: createPool and validate liq token
✅ xyk-pallet - Pool tests: createPool

✅ xyk-pallet - SecurityTests - Only sudo can perform actions [tokens.create]
✅ xyk-pallet - SecurityTests - Only sudo can perform actions [tokens.create to itself]
✅ xyk-pallet - SecurityTests - Only sudo can perform actions [tokens.mint]
✅ xyk-pallet - SecurityTests - Only sudo can perform actions [tokens.mint to itself]

✅ xyk-pallet - Sudo tests: Sudo Issue an asset
✅ xyk-pallet - Sudo tests: Sudo Issue two  different assets to the same account

xyk-rpc - calculate get_burn amount: OK
  ✅ validate parameters - burn from pool [firstIdx->0,secondIdx->1,amount->1000,expected->1000]
  ✅ validate parameters - burn from pool [firstIdx->1,secondIdx->0,amount->1000,expected->1000]
  ✅ validate parameters - burn from pool [firstIdx->0,secondIdx->1,amount->10000,expected->10000]
  ✅ validate parameters - burn from pool [firstIdx->0,secondIdx->1,amount->100000,expected->100000]
xyk-rpc - calculate get_burn amount: Missing requirements
  ✅ validate parameters - get_burn from not generated pool [soldTokenId->0,boughtTokenId->1,amount->1000,expected->0]
  ✅ validate parameters - get_burn from not created assets
xyk-rpc - calculate get_burn amount: RPC result matches with burn amount
  ✅ validate get_burn_amount that matches with real burn operation

xyk-rpc - calculate_buy_price_by_id, calculate_sell_price_by_id
  ✅ validate parameters - buy [soldTokenId->0,boughtTokenId->1,amount->0,expected->1]
  ✅ validate parameters - buy [soldTokenId->0,boughtTokenId->1,amount->1,expected->0]
  ✅ validate parameters - buy [soldTokenId->1,boughtTokenId->2,amount->0,expected->1]
  ✅ validate parameters - buy [soldTokenId->1,boughtTokenId->2,amount->1,expected->2]
  ✅ validate parameters - buy [soldTokenId->2,boughtTokenId->1,amount->1,expected->0]
  ✅ validate parameters - buy [soldTokenId->2,boughtTokenId->3,amount->1,expected->3]
  ✅ validate parameters - buy [soldTokenId->3,boughtTokenId->2,amount->1,expected->3]
  ✅ validate parameters - buy [soldTokenId->3,boughtTokenId->2,amount->2,expected->0]
  ✅ validate parameters - sell [soldTokenId->0,boughtTokenId->1,amount->0,expected->0]
  ✅ validate parameters - sell [soldTokenId->0,boughtTokenId->1,amount->1,expected->0]
  ✅ validate parameters - sell [soldTokenId->1,boughtTokenId->2,amount->0,expected->0]
  ✅ validate parameters - sell [soldTokenId->1,boughtTokenId->2,amount->1,expected->0]
  ✅ validate parameters - sell [soldTokenId->2,boughtTokenId->1,amount->1,expected->0]
  ✅ validate parameters - sell [soldTokenId->3,boughtTokenId->2,amount->1,expected->0]
  ✅ validate parameters - sell [soldTokenId->2,boughtTokenId->3,amount->1,expected->0]

✅ xyk-rpc - calculate_sell_price and calculate_buy_price matches, 1000,1000
✅ xyk-rpc - calculate_sell_price and calculate_buy_price matches, 2000,1000
✅ xyk-rpc - calculate_sell_price matches with the real sell
✅ xyk-rpc - calculate_buy_price matches with the real buy

✅ xyk-rpc - calculate_sell_price validates parameters - Negative params
✅ xyk-rpc - calculate_sell_price validates parameters - Negative params
✅ xyk-rpc - calculate_sell_price validates parameters - Negative params
✅ xyk-rpc - calculate_sell_price validates parameters - Zeroes [inputReserve->1,outputReserve->1,amount->0,expected->0]
✅ xyk-rpc - calculate_sell_price validates parameters - Zeroes [inputReserve->0,outputReserve->0,amount->0,expected->0]
✅ xyk-rpc - calculate_sell_price validates parameters - Zeroes [inputReserve->0,outputReserve->1,amount->1,expected->1]
✅ xyk-rpc - calculate_sell_price validates parameters - Zeroes [inputReserve->0,outputReserve->0,amount->1,expected->0]
✅ xyk-rpc - calculate_buy_price validates parameters - Zeroes [inputReserve->1,outputReserve->1,amount->0,expected->1]
✅ xyk-rpc - calculate_buy_price validates parameters - Zeroes [inputReserve->0,outputReserve->0,amount->0,expected->0]
✅ xyk-rpc - calculate_buy_price validates parameters - Zeroes [inputReserve->0,outputReserve->1,amount->1,expected->0]
✅ xyk-rpc - calculate_buy_price validates parameters - Zeroes [inputReserve->0,outputReserve->0,amount->1,expected->0]
✅ xyk-rpc - calculate_buy_price validates parameters - Zeroes [inputReserve->1,outputReserve->0,amount->0,expected->0]
✅ validate parameters: negative asset ids [soldTokenId->-1,boughtTokenId->0,amount->0,expected->createType(TokenId):: u32: Negative number passed to unsigned type]
✅ validate parameters: negative asset ids [soldTokenId->0,boughtTokenId->-1,amount->0,expected->createType(TokenId):: u32: Negative number passed to unsigned type]
✅ RPC big numbers : negative asset ids [amount->100000000]
✅ RPC big numbers : negative asset ids [amount->100000000000000]
✅ RPC big numbers : negative asset ids [amount->10000000000000000000000]
xyk-rpc - calculate_buy_price_by_id:No pool assotiated with the assets
  ✅ validate parameters [soldTokenId->0,boughtTokenId->1,amount->0,expected->0]
  ✅ validate parameters [soldTokenId->1,boughtTokenId->0,amount->1,expected->0]

Test candidates actions
  ✅ A user can become a candidate by joining as candidate
  ✅ A user can only join as candidate with one staking token at the same time
  ✅ A user can not join as candidate with a token that is not enabled ( or MGX )
  ✅ A candidate can select an aggregator by update_candidate_aggregator

Test candidates actions: Collision by liq token
  ✅ A candidate can join to the aggregator list when no more candidate joined with the same staking token

Test sudo actions
  ✅ Test that noSudo users cannot do specific operations: addStakingLiquidityToken
  ✅ Test that noSudo users cannot do specific operations: removeStakingLiquidityToken
  ✅ Test that noSudo users cannot do specific operations: setCollatorCommission
  ✅ Test that noSudo users cannot do specific operations: setTotalSelected

Story tests > LP
  ✅ Pool wins over 0.3% tokens when 10 swaps are done in the pool [Token - MGA]