Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

USD visOption pass through and manual #196

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 25, 2024

Conversation

stewartboogert
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 25, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 70.33%. Comparing base (15c6638) to head (cb974ad).
Report is 9 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #196   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   70.32%   70.33%           
=======================================
  Files         158      158           
  Lines       23618    23620    +2     
=======================================
+ Hits        16610    16612    +2     
  Misses       7008     7008           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@stewartboogert stewartboogert merged commit a9a51d7 into g4edge:main Oct 25, 2024
17 checks passed
v.traverseHierarchy(reg.getWorldVolume())
v.save()

`visOptions.color` and `visOptions.alpha` are passed though to the
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should be visOptions.colour instead of visOptions.color?

I think this would be important to fix in the docs, to not confuse users after the next release (it already is confusing enough that pyg4ometry uses colour and USD uses ...Color)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants