Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[lexical-markdown] Add test to keep code language #37

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: cloned_main_fb6a1
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

local-dev-korbit-ai-mentor[bot]
Copy link

@local-dev-korbit-ai-mentor local-dev-korbit-ai-mentor bot commented Aug 15, 2024

[lexical-markdown] Bug Fix: preserve language tag for Markdown code

Right now, PR contains only one commit with tests to highlight the problem.

If the markdown file contains a code block with an unsupported language (a language for which the project doesn't have syntax highlighter) the lexical will remove any information about that language.

Let's say we have markdown with the following content:

```rust
fn main() {
    println!("Hello World!");
}
```

If we don't have prism-rust in the project, lexical will strip all the info about the language and saved file will look like:

```
fn main() {
    println!("Hello World!");
}
```

That behavior seems to me like a bug.

Possible solution

I think CodeNode should always keep __language field, no matter what the mapToPrismLanguage() returns. And we can create another field called __isSyntaxHighlightSupported for highlighting check.

What do you think? I'll be happy to create another commit with a fix if provided solution works for the lexical team.

Description by Korbit AI

What change is being made?

Add unit tests to ensure that the code language is preserved in markdown conversion within the LexicalMarkdown package.

Why are these changes being made?

These changes are made to verify that the markdown conversion process correctly retains the specified code language, ensuring accurate syntax highlighting and language-specific formatting in the output. This addresses potential issues where the language might be lost or incorrectly handled during conversion.

Copy link
Author

Clone of the PR facebook/lexical#6259

Copy link

korbit-ai bot commented Aug 15, 2024

My review is in progress 📖 - I will have feedback for you in a few minutes!

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 15, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@korbit-ai korbit-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have reviewed your code and did not find any issues!


Please note that I can make mistakes, and you should still encourage your team to review your code as well.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant