Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UIIN-1669 JEST/RTL test cases for ItemForm.js #2143

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ssandupatla
Copy link
Contributor

UIIN-1669 JEST/RTL test cases for ItemsForm.js
URL: https://issues.folio.org/browse/UIIN-1669

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 4, 2023

Jest Unit Test Statistics

    1 files  ±0  198 suites  ±0   7m 2s ⏱️ + 1m 45s
603 tests  - 1  603 ✔️  - 1  0 💤 ±0  0 ±0 
608 runs   - 1  608 ✔️  - 1  0 💤 ±0  0 ±0 

Results for commit 2e987a8. ± Comparison against base commit b9cdf23.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 4, 2023

BigTest Unit Test Statistics

0 tests  ±0   0 ✔️ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
0 suites ±0   0 💤 ±0 
0 files   ±0   0 ±0 

Results for commit 2e987a8. ± Comparison against base commit b9cdf23.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented May 4, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@VSnehalatha VSnehalatha changed the title UIIN-1669 JEST/RTL test cases for ItemsForm.js UIIN-1669 JEST/RTL test cases for ItemForm.js May 5, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@VSnehalatha VSnehalatha left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Use userEvent in place of fireEvent

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants