-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: build java musl lib #420
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Mark Phelps <[email protected]>
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #420 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 87.35% 87.35%
=======================================
Files 9 9
Lines 3740 3740
=======================================
Hits 3267 3267
Misses 473 473 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Signed-off-by: Mark Phelps <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nice!
WithDirectory("/src/src/main/resources/linux-aarch64", hostDirectory.Directory("tmp/linux-aarch64"), dagger.ContainerWithDirectoryOpts{ | ||
Exclude: []string{"**/*.rlib", "**/*.a", "**/*.d"}, | ||
}). | ||
WithDirectory("/src/src/main/resources/linux-x86-64", hostDirectory.Directory("tmp/linux-x86-64"), dagger.ContainerWithDirectoryOpts{ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@markphelps did I miss tmp/linux_x86_64_musl
here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
no i dont think so. above we are renaming linux_x86_64_musl
which is where the rust engine initially lives to linux-x86-64
which is where Java expects the file to live:
"linux_arm64_musl": "linux-aarch64",
"linux_x86_64_musl": "linux-x86-64",
Re: #141 (comment)