-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Replace binwalk generic carver functionality with unblob #109
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
…pping of intermediate folder
* added action to build extractor image based on unblob-2 branch
I can get behind this; binwalk has largely been abandoned and unblob seems to be more accurate at carving out components. |
You can already use FACT and the FACT extractor with unblob as carver: A docker image based on this branch is available as tag "unblob" (see https://hub.docker.com/repository/docker/fkiecad/fact_extractor/general). So you can simply pull it with docker pull fkiecad/fact_extractor:unblob and if you want to use it in FACT you need to edit But be advised: unblob does not always work better than binwalk and there are many cases where files are not extracted that were extracted with binwalk as carver (e.g. whole file systems). This is also the reason we binwalk was not fully replaced with unblob in the extractor yet. |
FYI: There seems to be a bug in the latest version of the extractor container with unblob. It will not carve files because the CLI API/behavior changed in a way that carving files without unpacking is no longer possible in a recent version. We will push a fix to this branch soon. edit: I have pushed a fix and the image on docker hub should also already be fixed |
Has currently problems with certain container types (which unblob will not carve because it expects a dedicated unpacker to be available for these types). Will be ready when:
|
No description provided.