-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Create layer groups when uploading maps #69
Conversation
There's something I can't explain happening here! The first group creation and layer assignment works ok, but if I have multiple groups, then some of these groups just disappear when the processing finishes. Here's a screencast showing this occuring. At frist, the group is shown with the "processing" icon, but as soon as the processing finishes the group disappears and the layer is placed in no group (and its name is reset). Is this a backend issue? Peek.2024-05-28.14-43.mp4 |
Yeah, I think this is a backend issue, and I have an idea what it might be, but I'll have to investigate and get back to you. |
Just to confirm, are you only seeing it when you're creating a group with a single item? We have some oddities where under the hood a single "lone layer" is actually a layer within an invisible layer group. I think what's happening is that when the upload completes, the backend is seeing that there's a single layer in the group and it's hiding it. We should be able to make a change to avoid doing that in this case, but I'll need to check in with the guy who implemented the logic. As a workaround, it might be possible to avoid creating groups with only one layer? (Although I know that's kind of odd logic) |
Just to keep you updated -- yes, this is an issue with single layer groups, so that's a potential workaround. I have a fix on the Felt side but I'm still working on getting the naming logic right in the different cases (e.g. "single layer name provided by API but upload has multiple datasets, and upload got moved into a different group before it finished"). So I'm not sure if I'll have a PR in by tomorrow, may be more like Monday. |
@ChrisLoer I just tested this morning, and things are working much better now, thanks! Something you've fixed on the backend has improved things here. |
Yup! From email, it was three things (well really two that were relevant to this use case):
|
No description provided.