[lexical] Bug Fix: Set activeEditorState when using editor.setEditorState inside of an update #7034
+90
−39
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…tate inside of an update
etrepum
requested review from
zurfyx,
fantactuka,
acywatson,
Fetz,
ivailop7,
Sahejkm and
potatowagon
as code owners
facebook-github-bot
added
the
CLA Signed
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
size-limit report 📦
|
zurfyx
approved these changes
Jan 9, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
When you use
editor.setEditorStatefrom inside of an update, the change was not visible until the next deferred update or reconciliationCloses #6876
Test plan
Before
If you issued a
setEditorStateyou wouldn't be able to observe its effect until after the update functionAfter
Unit tests verify the expected behavior