[Lexical][Size-Checks] Measure both cjs/esm builds for regression checks

[Sahejkm]

WHAT

follow up on #6137

• Measure both cjs/esm build combinations for size checks
• Also ignore size-limit file from triggering extended tests run

WHY

• Current regression checks meaure only cjs checks, enhance to check both cjs/esm changes.
• Not needed to run e2e tests for size-limit workflow updates

Test

sahejk@sahejk-mbp lexical % npx size-limit
✔ Adding to empty webpack project
✔ Running JS in headless Chrome
  
  lexical - cjs
  Size:         22.5 kB with all dependencies, minified and brotlied
  Loading time: 440 ms  on slow 3G
  
  lexical - esm
  Size:         22.97 kB with all dependencies, minified and brotlied
  Loading time: 449 ms   on slow 3G
  
  @lexical/rich-text - cjs
  Size:         33.25 kB with all dependencies, minified and brotlied
  Loading time: 650 ms   on slow 3G
  
  @lexical/rich-text - esm
  Size:         23.05 kB with all dependencies, minified and brotlied
  Loading time: 451 ms   on slow 3G
  
  @lexical/plain-text - cjs
  Size:         33.21 kB with all dependencies, minified and brotlied
  Loading time: 649 ms   on slow 3G
  
  @lexical/plain-text - esm
  Size:         225 B with all dependencies, minified and brotlied
  Loading time: 10 ms on slow 3G
  
  @lexical/react - cjs
  Size:         150.4 kB with all dependencies, minified and brotlied
  Loading time: 3 s      on slow 3G
  
  @lexical/react - esm
  Size:         83.86 kB with all dependencies, minified and brotlied
  Loading time: 1.7 s    on slow 3G
  
sahejk@sahejk-mbp lexical % 

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
lexical	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	May 31, 2024 5:48am
lexical-playground	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	May 31, 2024 5:48am

[github-actions]

size-limit report 📦

Path	Size
lexical	23.97 KB (0%)
@lexical/rich-text	34.66 KB (0%)
@lexical/plain-text	34.65 KB (0%)
@lexical/react	149.31 KB (0%)

[etrepum]

Is there a reason to track dev size? It's not really clear what that would help with, since size is presumably not a primary concern for dev. It might be more useful to track the cjs and esm prod builds (probably not at Meta, but most other places are likely using esm or soon will be)

[Sahejkm]

thanks for reviewing Bob, Makes sense to me. Updated. lmk WDYT now ?

[etrepum]

Looks like it would work, but could be a bit simpler by using the exports for lookup instead of manipulating the paths directly

[Sahejkm]

Resolved comments, thanks for rereview!

[potatowagon]

lgtm

[Sahejkm]

test failures look unrelated, will check separately. Seems to impact other builds as well like https://github.com/facebook/lexical/pull/6216/checks